Documents / FOIA release

USSR: Measures of Economic Growth and Development, 1950-80

Central Intelligence Agency · 1982-12-08 · 399 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Joint Committee Print, dated December 8, 1982, gathers studies that the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Intelligence prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress. It gives estimates of Soviet gross national product for 1950 to 1980, with indexes of industrial production, agricultural production and consumption, and explains the methods and data behind them. The foreword says official Soviet statistics inflate growth and that the CIA measures offer a more accurate picture. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 4 …The volume contains a series of tables estimating the Soviet gross national product and its components…
  • p. 5 …quantified estimates of the value of Soviet gross national product (GNP), its rate of growth, its…
  • p. 6 …The Soviet indices of industrial and agricultural production are based on gross output rather than value…
  • p. 7 …For example, data on the amount of waste included in the gross output data of agricultural…
  • p. 8 …The measure shown represents “net output,” or gross output less products used by agriculture (seed and…
  • p. 9 …compendium on the Soviet eeonomV- “The Real Gross National Product of the U.S.S.R…
  • p. 10 …Contributions of Rush V. Greenslade ________ _________________-________ ____ __ 1x I. Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950—80.-______________________________ 3…
  • p. 12 …Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421 Part I. GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT OF THE USSR, 1950-80 By…
  • p. 14 …Turnover Taxes as a Share of Gross Output in Industry, 1972 6. Subsidies on Agricultural Products…
  • p. 15 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the Soviet Union in Established Prices, 39 by…
  • p. 16 …of Value Added in Agriculture B-8. Gross Output, Total Material Purchases, and Value Added in…
  • p. 17 …I Soviet Gross National Product in Established Priceskby End Use, I if I970 D-6. I…
  • p. 18 …An International Comparison, 1981 Gross National Product of the USSR: An International Comparison, 1982 Soviet Economic…
  • p. 19 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950-80 Introduction This paper presents…
  • p. 20 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product in Established Prices, 1955-1975,” Jahrbuch der Wirtsc/la/I Osteuropas…
  • p. 27 …GNP for the Soviet Union and of gross domestic product (GDP) for selected OECD countries.” For…
  • p. 34 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product," p. 413; and Becker, 1969, p. 128. difference between the growth…
  • p. 35 …conducted on a net rather than a gross basis. The enterprise is expected to be managed…
  • p. 41 …the business sector and are included in gross private business investment. The second US account shows…
  • p. 43 …On the other hand, the tax amounts to 30 percent of the gross output of the…
  • p. 44 …Turnover taxes were 30 and 56 percent of the gross outputs of the sugar and other…
  • p. 45 …The capital stock data used in this study are gross of depreciation. Approved for Release: 2019…
  • p. 47 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 8 Billion Rubles Gross National Product of the Soviet Union ' in…
  • p. 48 …The row and column sums are determined as each sector’s gross output less, respec- tively…
  • p. 49 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 10 Percent 1970 Soviet Gross National Product by End Use W…
  • p. 52 …Therefore, value added is computed as a residual—the difference between gross output and current material…
  • p. 53 …Therefore, if in- dexes of gross output and current inputs are both available, the gross output…
  • p. 56 …Each subbranch index measures the gross output of an I-O sector by summing the physical…
  • p. 57 …The material-input index is less desirable than a double deflation or gross output index, but…
  • p. 58 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Appendix A ' Soviet Gross National Product, 1950-80 This appendix presents the…
  • p. 59 …5 0.5 0.6 0.6 Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8…
  • p. 60 …4 ._ §l§5QfI.i2j§§5 1.0 Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 61 …4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Gross national product 383.3 398.2 405.7…
  • p. 62 …0 5.2 3.7 2.7___ Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5.0…
  • p. 63 …8 7.6 5.8 4.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 64 …5.1 4.; 2.9 7.7“ ' Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 65 …2 3.4 0.8 1 4 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 66 …9 0.3 2.5 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 67 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 68 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 69 …3 51.2 55.1 58.3 _ Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 71 …7 134.1 135.2 137.1 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 72 …27.5 24.. ?6i5j_; Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8 153.4 160…
  • p. 73 …1 43.7 45.9 s9.7_‘ Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 75 …4.5 1.1 5.9 -3.1 Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5…
  • p. 76 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 77 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 78 …g 4.3 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 79 …1 28.1 29.1 30.2 Gross national product 741.7 752.2 784.0…
  • p. 80 …9 36.6 31.8 Ww3§’.98W Gross national product 1,083.8 1,124.6…
  • p. 81 …1 46.1 46.9 46.8 Gross national product 1,578.5 1,624.6…
  • p. 82 …3.2 7* 1.4 1.3 Gross national product 3.7 4.0 3.5…
  • p. 83 …1 14.0 13.8 13.5 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 84 …8 13.4 13.3 7 17717 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 85 …4 9.6 8.1 6.9 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 86 …31.7 65.3______s.9 g Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 87 …9 98.2 103.1 89.1 Gross national product 60.6 64.0 66.4…
  • p. 88 …8 110.4 93.7 81.8 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 89 …Subtracting the deflated material pur- chases from the deflated gross output produces value added in constant…
  • p. 90 …The ratio of material inputs (gross output less NMP) to gross output declined slowly in this…
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
better surrogates in that they include price bonuses
and penalties, but they are for one producer only. The
average of procurement prices paid in 1970 to all
producers is the best surrogate for average realized
prices.
The following tabulation shows where substitutions
have been made for average realized prices. Each
price used in the index is derived in appendix B.
RSFSR List Procurement Average
Procurement Prices Paid Procurement
Prices to Collective Prices Paid
Farms to All
Producers
Sugarbeets Fruit
Flax fiber Cotton
Tobacco Tea
Makhorka
Silk
Average
Realized
Prices
Oil crops
(except
sunflower
seed)
Honey
Grain
Potatoes
Vegetables
Meat
Livestock
inventory
Milk
Eggs
Wool
Sunflower seed
potatoes and vegetables, a lower price is used. By
virtue of the calculation, quantities of grain fed are
standard weight so should be priced at average real-
ized prices. Whole milk fed, however, may not be of
standard butterfat content—the basis for the price~
so could be overvalued. The effect of this over-
statement is small; sensitivity tests indicate that valu-
ing feed at Soviet cost of production does not affect
trends. (See section VII.)
C. The Index
The CIA index of Soviet net agricultural production
shows steadily declining growth after 1960. This trend
is especially prominent in net output of the livestock
sector. Table 3 shows indexes of output for major
commodity groups in benchmark years related to the
base year 1970, while the following tabulation sum-
marizes growth rates for these commodities.
Average Annual Percentage Rates of
Growth -
'
1951-79 I951-60 I961-70 I971-79
The error introduced by these substitutions probably
is small. Average realized prices have been used for
the most important commodities in the index. In the
two cases where list procurement prices have been
used the value of output is small. The value of
commodities priced with collective farm procurement
prices probably is overstated; a comparison of pro-
curement prices for commodities where we have prices
for state farms, collective farms, and private produc-
ers shows that average procurement prices paid to
state farms are often somewhat less than those paid to
collective farms and private producers. Since collec-
tive farm market sales of oilseeds, flax, tobacco,
makhorka, silk, cotton, and tea are insignificant,
procurement prices in these cases are an acceptable
substitute for average realized prices. The average
procurement prices understate the value of output
significantly only in the case of fruit and honey, where
collective farm market sales are substantial. Cotton
and tea are sold exclusively through the state procure-
ment system.
Valuing commodities fed at average realized prices
overstates feed use if the portion fed is of much lower
quality than the portion marketed. In the case of
Grain 2.5 3.4 i°__. I °~_3. _.__
Potatoes 0.2 0} 2.0 -0.5
Fruits and vegetables 5.1 _ 6.5 5.3“ 3.3
Technical crops 3.3 _f 4.6 4.0 i 1.3
Net crop output 2.4 2.6 3.7
Meat 4.1 6.1
f 0.7__k
Q 1*-5_._, -2-1 -
Milk 3.4 _ 5.7 _3.0 1_._3 __
Other 4.6 9.0 5.5 W ¥i0.9
Net livestock output 3.7 g
6.1 ‘3.7 1.0
C
Net agricultural
output 3.0 4.3 3.7 0.9
Among crops, fruits and vegetables grew most rapidly
over the 1951-79 period, rising from 10 percent of net
crop output in 1950 to 22 percent in 1979. Growth in
grain output held at fairly steady rates while potato
output posted almost no growth. At the same time,
potatoes fell from 40 percent of net crop output in
1950 to 22 percent in 1979. Crop output shows more
variation in growth rates than the livestock sector
where growth rates slowed over the entire period. By
1971-79, only fruits, vegetables, and meat were grow-
ing at average annual rates above 2 percent. For many
Z59
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 399 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.