Documents / FOIA release

USSR: Measures of Economic Growth and Development, 1950-80

Central Intelligence Agency · 1982-12-08 · 399 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Joint Committee Print, dated December 8, 1982, gathers studies that the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Intelligence prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress. It gives estimates of Soviet gross national product for 1950 to 1980, with indexes of industrial production, agricultural production and consumption, and explains the methods and data behind them. The foreword says official Soviet statistics inflate growth and that the CIA measures offer a more accurate picture. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 36 …In the USSR the collective farm, or kolkhoz, is part state and part cooperative. The land…
  • p. 47 …0.66e_ Consumer cooperatives 1.283 i Retained profits of consumer cooperatives 0.821 Tax on…
  • p. 50 …Hill, The Measurement of Real Product, The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 1971; R…
  • p. 103 …Net profits of consumer cooperatives were included with retail trade and public dining. Subsidies. This item…
  • p. 118 …and economic admin- istration, administrative organs of cooperative and social organizations,” for which employment and oth…
  • p. 119 …Social organi- zations include the administrative organs of the All- Union Society of Consumer Cooperatives, the…
  • p. 130 …The profits distributed to consumer cooperative members are now considered to be a transfer receipt rather…
  • p. 133 …Profits distributed to consumer cooperative members 0.027 9. Total income 217.206 Sources to this…
  • p. 134 …Profits distributed to consumer cooperative members. See CIA, GNP I970, p. 23. 9. Total income. This…
  • p. 135 …State, cooperative, and commission sales 141.096 (1)Fo0d 84.104 (2) Soft goods 42.734…
  • p. 137 …Charges paid by members of housing 0.075 cooperatives for maintenance lmputed gross rent on urban…
  • p. 138 …Taxes on land and buildings owned by individuals and cooperatives are from Gosb_vudzhet I972, p…
  • p. 139 …Retained profits of consumer cooperatives 0.821 d. Retained profits of other organizations 0.321 2…
  • p. 142 …Profits distributed to consumer 0.027 cooperative members 8.’C;solidate_d total outlays 215.841…
  • p. 147 …Consumer cooperatives 1.283 (1) Retained profits of consumer cooperatives 0.821 (2) Tax on income…
  • p. 160 …532) plus a share of the amortization deductions of consumer cooperatives. Altough consumer cooperatives are primarily…
  • p. 162 …532) and amortization deductions of consumer cooperatives on industrial capital (0.083 billion ru~ bles-—see…
  • p. 164 …retained profits and income taxes of consumer cooperatives and other organizations, respectively. 7. Total pra/its…
  • p. 257 …Other state purchasing orga- nizations are the Central Union of Consumer Cooper- atives, and the Ministries…
  • p. 286 …Review of I978 and Outlook for I97 9, Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service, April 1979, p…
  • p. 330 …exceeded the prices paid in state and cooperative retail outlets by an average of ~59 percent…
  • p. 331 …index of retail prices in state and cooperative outlets. The index which shows almost no change…
  • p. 332 …In coverage, it differs from the CIA index of consumption, mainly by inclusion of cooperative housing…
  • p. 335 …purchases of these items in state and cooperative retail outlets and in collective farm markets, including…
  • p. 339 …The index implicitly covers all goods purchased in state and cooperative retail out- lets, except those…
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
better surrogates in that they include price bonuses
and penalties, but they are for one producer only. The
average of procurement prices paid in 1970 to all
producers is the best surrogate for average realized
prices.
The following tabulation shows where substitutions
have been made for average realized prices. Each
price used in the index is derived in appendix B.
RSFSR List Procurement Average
Procurement Prices Paid Procurement
Prices to Collective Prices Paid
Farms to All
Producers
Sugarbeets Fruit
Flax fiber Cotton
Tobacco Tea
Makhorka
Silk
Average
Realized
Prices
Oil crops
(except
sunflower
seed)
Honey
Grain
Potatoes
Vegetables
Meat
Livestock
inventory
Milk
Eggs
Wool
Sunflower seed
potatoes and vegetables, a lower price is used. By
virtue of the calculation, quantities of grain fed are
standard weight so should be priced at average real-
ized prices. Whole milk fed, however, may not be of
standard butterfat content—the basis for the price~
so could be overvalued. The effect of this over-
statement is small; sensitivity tests indicate that valu-
ing feed at Soviet cost of production does not affect
trends. (See section VII.)
C. The Index
The CIA index of Soviet net agricultural production
shows steadily declining growth after 1960. This trend
is especially prominent in net output of the livestock
sector. Table 3 shows indexes of output for major
commodity groups in benchmark years related to the
base year 1970, while the following tabulation sum-
marizes growth rates for these commodities.
Average Annual Percentage Rates of
Growth -
'
1951-79 I951-60 I961-70 I971-79
The error introduced by these substitutions probably
is small. Average realized prices have been used for
the most important commodities in the index. In the
two cases where list procurement prices have been
used the value of output is small. The value of
commodities priced with collective farm procurement
prices probably is overstated; a comparison of pro-
curement prices for commodities where we have prices
for state farms, collective farms, and private produc-
ers shows that average procurement prices paid to
state farms are often somewhat less than those paid to
collective farms and private producers. Since collec-
tive farm market sales of oilseeds, flax, tobacco,
makhorka, silk, cotton, and tea are insignificant,
procurement prices in these cases are an acceptable
substitute for average realized prices. The average
procurement prices understate the value of output
significantly only in the case of fruit and honey, where
collective farm market sales are substantial. Cotton
and tea are sold exclusively through the state procure-
ment system.
Valuing commodities fed at average realized prices
overstates feed use if the portion fed is of much lower
quality than the portion marketed. In the case of
Grain 2.5 3.4 i°__. I °~_3. _.__
Potatoes 0.2 0} 2.0 -0.5
Fruits and vegetables 5.1 _ 6.5 5.3“ 3.3
Technical crops 3.3 _f 4.6 4.0 i 1.3
Net crop output 2.4 2.6 3.7
Meat 4.1 6.1
f 0.7__k
Q 1*-5_._, -2-1 -
Milk 3.4 _ 5.7 _3.0 1_._3 __
Other 4.6 9.0 5.5 W ¥i0.9
Net livestock output 3.7 g
6.1 ‘3.7 1.0
C
Net agricultural
output 3.0 4.3 3.7 0.9
Among crops, fruits and vegetables grew most rapidly
over the 1951-79 period, rising from 10 percent of net
crop output in 1950 to 22 percent in 1979. Growth in
grain output held at fairly steady rates while potato
output posted almost no growth. At the same time,
potatoes fell from 40 percent of net crop output in
1950 to 22 percent in 1979. Crop output shows more
variation in growth rates than the livestock sector
where growth rates slowed over the entire period. By
1971-79, only fruits, vegetables, and meat were grow-
ing at average annual rates above 2 percent. For many
Z59
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 399 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.