Documents / FOIA release

USSR: Measures of Economic Growth and Development, 1950-80

Central Intelligence Agency · 1982-12-08 · 399 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Joint Committee Print, dated December 8, 1982, gathers studies that the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Intelligence prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress. It gives estimates of Soviet gross national product for 1950 to 1980, with indexes of industrial production, agricultural production and consumption, and explains the methods and data behind them. The foreword says official Soviet statistics inflate growth and that the CIA measures offer a more accurate picture. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 36 …In the USSR the collective farm, or kolkhoz, is part state and part cooperative. The land…
  • p. 47 …0.66e_ Consumer cooperatives 1.283 i Retained profits of consumer cooperatives 0.821 Tax on…
  • p. 50 …Hill, The Measurement of Real Product, The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 1971; R…
  • p. 103 …Net profits of consumer cooperatives were included with retail trade and public dining. Subsidies. This item…
  • p. 118 …and economic admin- istration, administrative organs of cooperative and social organizations,” for which employment and oth…
  • p. 119 …Social organi- zations include the administrative organs of the All- Union Society of Consumer Cooperatives, the…
  • p. 130 …The profits distributed to consumer cooperative members are now considered to be a transfer receipt rather…
  • p. 133 …Profits distributed to consumer cooperative members 0.027 9. Total income 217.206 Sources to this…
  • p. 134 …Profits distributed to consumer cooperative members. See CIA, GNP I970, p. 23. 9. Total income. This…
  • p. 135 …State, cooperative, and commission sales 141.096 (1)Fo0d 84.104 (2) Soft goods 42.734…
  • p. 137 …Charges paid by members of housing 0.075 cooperatives for maintenance lmputed gross rent on urban…
  • p. 138 …Taxes on land and buildings owned by individuals and cooperatives are from Gosb_vudzhet I972, p…
  • p. 139 …Retained profits of consumer cooperatives 0.821 d. Retained profits of other organizations 0.321 2…
  • p. 142 …Profits distributed to consumer 0.027 cooperative members 8.’C;solidate_d total outlays 215.841…
  • p. 147 …Consumer cooperatives 1.283 (1) Retained profits of consumer cooperatives 0.821 (2) Tax on income…
  • p. 160 …532) plus a share of the amortization deductions of consumer cooperatives. Altough consumer cooperatives are primarily…
  • p. 162 …532) and amortization deductions of consumer cooperatives on industrial capital (0.083 billion ru~ bles-—see…
  • p. 164 …retained profits and income taxes of consumer cooperatives and other organizations, respectively. 7. Total pra/its…
  • p. 257 …Other state purchasing orga- nizations are the Central Union of Consumer Cooper- atives, and the Ministries…
  • p. 286 …Review of I978 and Outlook for I97 9, Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service, April 1979, p…
  • p. 330 …exceeded the prices paid in state and cooperative retail outlets by an average of ~59 percent…
  • p. 331 …index of retail prices in state and cooperative outlets. The index which shows almost no change…
  • p. 332 …In coverage, it differs from the CIA index of consumption, mainly by inclusion of cooperative housing…
  • p. 335 …purchases of these items in state and cooperative retail outlets and in collective farm markets, including…
  • p. 339 …The index implicitly covers all goods purchased in state and cooperative retail out- lets, except those…
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
shipped to final demand in a given sector embodies
the same value added regardless of whether the
machinery is a producer or consumer durable. Based
on this assumption, the value added for each machin-
ery type can be estimated by multiplying total sector
value added by each component’s share of deliveries
to final demand.
Some bias is introduced by determining the relative
importance of producer and consumer durables as
described above. Deliveries of many machinery sec-
tors to final demand categories other than private
consumption undoubtedly include substantial
amounts of purely military machinery; not all military
hardware is produced in the “other machinery” sector
of table B-1. This gives producer durables an exces-
sively high weight and consumer durables too low a
weight.
In the fourth step the producer and consumer dura-
bles indexes are calculated separately. Indexes of each
type are converted into value added by linking them to
the values derived in table B-1: the resulting values
are then summed for every year.
The fifth step derives the production index for civilian
machinery by using the control totals for 1972 value
added of consumer durables and producer durables in
table B-1, that is, 41,599 and 5,658 million rubles,
respectively. Applying these weights to the producer
durables and consumer durables indexes and adding
them together provide the index for civilian
machinery.
Finally, the civilian and military machinery indexes
are combined into an index of total Soviet machinery
production. The weights are obtained according to the
following procedure. The figure for military machin-
ery production in 1972 (after deducting common use
durables) is converted to value added by using the
ratio of total machinery final demand to value added
as given in the reconstructed 1972 input-output table.
The military share of value added in machinery
production in 1972 is derived by comparing this value
with total value added in the machinery branch. The
indexes of output for civilian machinery and military
machinery are then used to find the shares in the base
year, l970—for military machinery, about one-third
and for civilian machinery, about two-thirds.
244
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 399 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.