Documents / FOIA release

USSR: Measures of Economic Growth and Development, 1950-80

Central Intelligence Agency · 1982-12-08 · 399 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Joint Committee Print, dated December 8, 1982, gathers studies that the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Intelligence prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress. It gives estimates of Soviet gross national product for 1950 to 1980, with indexes of industrial production, agricultural production and consumption, and explains the methods and data behind them. The foreword says official Soviet statistics inflate growth and that the CIA measures offer a more accurate picture. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 4 …The volume contains a series of tables estimating the Soviet gross national product and its components…
  • p. 5 …quantified estimates of the value of Soviet gross national product (GNP), its rate of growth, its…
  • p. 6 …The Soviet indices of industrial and agricultural production are based on gross output rather than value…
  • p. 7 …For example, data on the amount of waste included in the gross output data of agricultural…
  • p. 8 …The measure shown represents “net output,” or gross output less products used by agriculture (seed and…
  • p. 9 …compendium on the Soviet eeonomV- “The Real Gross National Product of the U.S.S.R…
  • p. 10 …Contributions of Rush V. Greenslade ________ _________________-________ ____ __ 1x I. Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950—80.-______________________________ 3…
  • p. 12 …Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421 Part I. GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT OF THE USSR, 1950-80 By…
  • p. 14 …Turnover Taxes as a Share of Gross Output in Industry, 1972 6. Subsidies on Agricultural Products…
  • p. 15 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the Soviet Union in Established Prices, 39 by…
  • p. 16 …of Value Added in Agriculture B-8. Gross Output, Total Material Purchases, and Value Added in…
  • p. 17 …I Soviet Gross National Product in Established Priceskby End Use, I if I970 D-6. I…
  • p. 18 …An International Comparison, 1981 Gross National Product of the USSR: An International Comparison, 1982 Soviet Economic…
  • p. 19 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950-80 Introduction This paper presents…
  • p. 20 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product in Established Prices, 1955-1975,” Jahrbuch der Wirtsc/la/I Osteuropas…
  • p. 27 …GNP for the Soviet Union and of gross domestic product (GDP) for selected OECD countries.” For…
  • p. 34 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product," p. 413; and Becker, 1969, p. 128. difference between the growth…
  • p. 35 …conducted on a net rather than a gross basis. The enterprise is expected to be managed…
  • p. 41 …the business sector and are included in gross private business investment. The second US account shows…
  • p. 43 …On the other hand, the tax amounts to 30 percent of the gross output of the…
  • p. 44 …Turnover taxes were 30 and 56 percent of the gross outputs of the sugar and other…
  • p. 45 …The capital stock data used in this study are gross of depreciation. Approved for Release: 2019…
  • p. 47 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 8 Billion Rubles Gross National Product of the Soviet Union ' in…
  • p. 48 …The row and column sums are determined as each sector’s gross output less, respec- tively…
  • p. 49 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 10 Percent 1970 Soviet Gross National Product by End Use W…
  • p. 52 …Therefore, value added is computed as a residual—the difference between gross output and current material…
  • p. 53 …Therefore, if in- dexes of gross output and current inputs are both available, the gross output…
  • p. 56 …Each subbranch index measures the gross output of an I-O sector by summing the physical…
  • p. 57 …The material-input index is less desirable than a double deflation or gross output index, but…
  • p. 58 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Appendix A ' Soviet Gross National Product, 1950-80 This appendix presents the…
  • p. 59 …5 0.5 0.6 0.6 Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8…
  • p. 60 …4 ._ §l§5QfI.i2j§§5 1.0 Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 61 …4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Gross national product 383.3 398.2 405.7…
  • p. 62 …0 5.2 3.7 2.7___ Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5.0…
  • p. 63 …8 7.6 5.8 4.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 64 …5.1 4.; 2.9 7.7“ ' Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 65 …2 3.4 0.8 1 4 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 66 …9 0.3 2.5 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 67 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 68 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 69 …3 51.2 55.1 58.3 _ Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 71 …7 134.1 135.2 137.1 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 72 …27.5 24.. ?6i5j_; Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8 153.4 160…
  • p. 73 …1 43.7 45.9 s9.7_‘ Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 75 …4.5 1.1 5.9 -3.1 Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5…
  • p. 76 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 77 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 78 …g 4.3 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 79 …1 28.1 29.1 30.2 Gross national product 741.7 752.2 784.0…
  • p. 80 …9 36.6 31.8 Ww3§’.98W Gross national product 1,083.8 1,124.6…
  • p. 81 …1 46.1 46.9 46.8 Gross national product 1,578.5 1,624.6…
  • p. 82 …3.2 7* 1.4 1.3 Gross national product 3.7 4.0 3.5…
  • p. 83 …1 14.0 13.8 13.5 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 84 …8 13.4 13.3 7 17717 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 85 …4 9.6 8.1 6.9 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 86 …31.7 65.3______s.9 g Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 87 …9 98.2 103.1 89.1 Gross national product 60.6 64.0 66.4…
  • p. 88 …8 110.4 93.7 81.8 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 89 …Subtracting the deflated material pur- chases from the deflated gross output produces value added in constant…
  • p. 90 …The ratio of material inputs (gross output less NMP) to gross output declined slowly in this…
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
In addition to gaps in coverage for the earlier years,
there are numerous problems with the more recent
data, which are both difficult to quantify and poten-
tially more serious. During the past decade, Soviet
statistical authorities have continuously reduced the
amount of information reported from one year to the
next. The “Industry” section in the latest Narkhoz,
for example, contains only 80 pages in contrast to the
142 pages in the 1970 edition. At least 10 percent of
the SPIOER series published directly in the Narkhoz
in 1970 no longer appear there. Thus, greater reliance
must be placed on estimates based on other sources.
The information on which to base these estimates also
has become more fragmentary, so that the estimates
are more subject to error. Since the Soviets are more
likely to delete publication of a series when its growth
trend becomes unfavorable, SPIOER estimates may
suffer from an upward bias. Fortunately, the series
deleted from standard publication so far have not had
a major impact on the SPIOER sample, but the trend
is potentially troublesome.
In terms of the absolute number of sample items, the
physical output series dominate-—they account for
292 (94 percent) of the 312 statistical series in the
index. (See appendix A-1 for a listing of the sample.)
The CSA value series account for another 4 percent
and the GVO indexes comprise the remaining 2
percent of the sample. Comparisons of the absolute
number of statistical series are deceptive, however,
because some series have significantly greater impact
on the aggregate indexes than other series. The
approximate share of each type of statistical series in
the industry portion of the 1972 Soviet input-output
table weighted by value added is:
Type of Series Percent
Including
Unrepresented
Products °
Excluding
Unrepresented
Products
Quantity 73.3 79.7
CSA rubles 10.7 11.6
CSA gross value of output 8.0 8.7
index
Unrepresented 8.0
= Unrepresented products are those items lacking any SPIOER
counterpart. Some examples of this are cable products, tools and
dies, and construction materials machinery and equipment.
The relative importance of value and index series
based on the share of industrial output they represent
is three times more than their importance based
strictly upon a count of the number of series used.
Nonetheless, quantity series still have much the larg-
est weight in the calculation of SPIOER indexes.
Sectors, Branches, and Groups. The next step-up in
the taxonomy of the industrial production index is the
input-output sector. This level is based on the 88-
sector version of the 1972 input-output table in pro-
ducer prices, of which only the first 81 sectors consti-
tute Soviet industry.° The remaining sectors consist of
nonindustrial activity such as agriculture, transporta-
tion, communications, and retail trade. Adapting
SPIOER indexes to the input-output framework per-
mits us to (1) compare our indexes with the 1959,
1966, and 1972 input-output tables, (2) determine
changes in the production mix over time, (3) judge the
representativeness of our sample, and (4) most impor-
tantly, employ value-added weights at a fairly disag-
gregated level. SPIOER product series currently rep-
resent all but 12 of the 84 industrial sectors. Of the 72
sectors covered, 58 sector indexes are determined at
least partially by quantity samples, ll are partly
value series, and five are based solely on the CSA
gross value of output indexes.
The level immediately above the input-output sector is
the Soviet branch (otrasl '), which is formed by com-
bining selected input-output sectors. Branch-level in-
dexes have three advantages: (l) the 10 major
branches are much more manageable for analysis
than the numerous input-output sectors; (2) the
branch structure matches published Soviet data and,
therefore, facilitates comparisons and tests of the
SPIOER indexes; and (3) value added at factor cost
can be calculated from Soviet data only at the branch
level or above in l970—the base year for CIA‘s GNP
accounts.“
’ The metal-producing sectors are an exception. The 1972 recon-
structed input-output table combines ferrous metals, ferrous ores,
nonferrous metals, and nonferrous ores into one sector. This is
inadequate disaggregation for our purposes. Thus, we use relation-
ships among these four sectors from the 1966 table in 1970
producer prices to estimate value added in the four sectors in 1972.
For our purposes, therefore, the input-output table has 84 industrial
sectors.
'° See JEC, GNP, I950-80.
183
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 399 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.