Documents / FOIA release

USSR: Measures of Economic Growth and Development, 1950-80

Central Intelligence Agency · 1982-12-08 · 399 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Joint Committee Print, dated December 8, 1982, gathers studies that the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Intelligence prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress. It gives estimates of Soviet gross national product for 1950 to 1980, with indexes of industrial production, agricultural production and consumption, and explains the methods and data behind them. The foreword says official Soviet statistics inflate growth and that the CIA measures offer a more accurate picture. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 36 …In the USSR the collective farm, or kolkhoz, is part state and part cooperative. The land…
  • p. 47 …0.66e_ Consumer cooperatives 1.283 i Retained profits of consumer cooperatives 0.821 Tax on…
  • p. 50 …Hill, The Measurement of Real Product, The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 1971; R…
  • p. 103 …Net profits of consumer cooperatives were included with retail trade and public dining. Subsidies. This item…
  • p. 118 …and economic admin- istration, administrative organs of cooperative and social organizations,” for which employment and oth…
  • p. 119 …Social organi- zations include the administrative organs of the All- Union Society of Consumer Cooperatives, the…
  • p. 130 …The profits distributed to consumer cooperative members are now considered to be a transfer receipt rather…
  • p. 133 …Profits distributed to consumer cooperative members 0.027 9. Total income 217.206 Sources to this…
  • p. 134 …Profits distributed to consumer cooperative members. See CIA, GNP I970, p. 23. 9. Total income. This…
  • p. 135 …State, cooperative, and commission sales 141.096 (1)Fo0d 84.104 (2) Soft goods 42.734…
  • p. 137 …Charges paid by members of housing 0.075 cooperatives for maintenance lmputed gross rent on urban…
  • p. 138 …Taxes on land and buildings owned by individuals and cooperatives are from Gosb_vudzhet I972, p…
  • p. 139 …Retained profits of consumer cooperatives 0.821 d. Retained profits of other organizations 0.321 2…
  • p. 142 …Profits distributed to consumer 0.027 cooperative members 8.’C;solidate_d total outlays 215.841…
  • p. 147 …Consumer cooperatives 1.283 (1) Retained profits of consumer cooperatives 0.821 (2) Tax on income…
  • p. 160 …532) plus a share of the amortization deductions of consumer cooperatives. Altough consumer cooperatives are primarily…
  • p. 162 …532) and amortization deductions of consumer cooperatives on industrial capital (0.083 billion ru~ bles-—see…
  • p. 164 …retained profits and income taxes of consumer cooperatives and other organizations, respectively. 7. Total pra/its…
  • p. 257 …Other state purchasing orga- nizations are the Central Union of Consumer Cooper- atives, and the Ministries…
  • p. 286 …Review of I978 and Outlook for I97 9, Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service, April 1979, p…
  • p. 330 …exceeded the prices paid in state and cooperative retail outlets by an average of ~59 percent…
  • p. 331 …index of retail prices in state and cooperative outlets. The index which shows almost no change…
  • p. 332 …In coverage, it differs from the CIA index of consumption, mainly by inclusion of cooperative housing…
  • p. 335 …purchases of these items in state and cooperative retail outlets and in collective farm markets, including…
  • p. 339 …The index implicitly covers all goods purchased in state and cooperative retail out- lets, except those…
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
An Index of Industrial
Production in the USSR
Introduction
Any attempt to assess Soviet economic development
and to measure aggregate economic activity requires a
reliable measure of industrial production. The official
measures prepared by Soviet statistical agencies are
unreliable by Western standards, so independent esti-
mates are necessary.‘ The CIA’s Office of Economic
Research Indexes of Soviet Industrial Production
(SPIOER) circumvent weaknesses inherent in official
statistics. These indexes, first published in 1963, have
been revised over the years to improve the methodolo-
gy and adjust to data availability.’
The current revisions, like their predecessors, adopt as
a model the Federal Reserve Board’s industrial pro-
duction index for the United States. The revised
methodology enhances SPIOER’s compatibility with
the structure of Soviet input-output tables and makes
the SPIOER branch indexes more comparable in
scope with official time series. Frequent changes in
reporting procedures—a persistent problem with Sovi-
et data—make earlier versions of the indexes less
representative with time and force an inappropriate
reliance on obsolete data. Therefore, this revision of
SPIOER tries to conform to current Soviet reporting
practices.
‘ The problems of the official Soviet measures are discussed in CIA,
Comparing Planned and Actual Growth of Industrial Output in
Centrally Planned Economies, ER 80-10461 (August 1980).
’ Descriptions of the changing methodology behind these indexes
have been published over the years. For example, the writings of the
late Rush V. Greenslade are especially prolific on this topic. In
particular, see “Industrial Production Statistics in the USSR,” in
Vladimir G. Treml and John P. Hardt, eds., Soviet Economic
Statistics, (Durham: Duke University Press, 1972), pp. 155-194;
with Wade Robertson, “Industrial Production in the USSR,"
Soviet Economic Prospects for the Seventies, US Congress, Joint
Economic Committee (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing
Office, June 27, 1973), pp. 270-282; and “The Real Gross National
Product of the USSR, 1950-75," Soviet Economy in a New
Perspective, US Congress, Joint Economic Committee (Washing-
ton, D.C.: Government Printing Office, October 14, 1976), pp. 269-
300. See also F. Douglas Whitehouse and Ray Converse, “Soviet
Industry: Recent Performance and Future Prospects,” Soviet Econ-
omy in a Time of Change, vol. 1, US Congress, Joint Economic
Committee (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, Octo-
ber 10, 1979), pp. 402-422.
This paper first describes the updated SPIOER proce-
dures. The revised methodology is described in terms
of the taxonomy of the individual indexes, the stand-
ard approach, the special case of machinery, and the
computation of the total industry index. The next
section presents the indexes and discusses the pattern
of industrial growth from 1950 to 1980. In the last
section both the indexes and the samples are subjected
to several tests to determine their reasonableness.
The Revised Methodology
Taxonomy of the Industrial Index
The revised industrial production index uses a five-
tier stratification of industry:
~ Individual products, for example, iron ore.
' Input-output sectors, for example, ferrous ores.
' Branches of industry, for example, ferrous metals.
' Major industry groups, for example, industrial
materials.
' Total industry.
The process of going from product samples to an
index of total industrial production is summarized in
figure 2. Product data are aggregated into sector
indexes using l July 1967 prices as weights. That is,
output of a given product in physical units is multi-
plied by its July 1967 price, and the value is summed
together with like values for other products of the
sector to obtain a value from which a sector index can
be calculated. Branch indexes are calculated from
sector indexes using value added derived from the
1972 input-output table in producer prices to elimi-
nate the double-counting inherent in adding the value
of output of earlier stages of production to values at
later stages—for example, adding the value of iron
ore to the value of steel. The aggregations from
branches to industry groups and finally to total
179
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 399 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.