Documents / FOIA release
This Joint Committee Print, dated December 8, 1982, gathers studies that the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Intelligence prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress. It gives estimates of Soviet gross national product for 1950 to 1980, with indexes of industrial production, agricultural production and consumption, and explains the methods and data behind them. The foreword says official Soviet statistics inflate growth and that the CIA measures offer a more accurate picture. The document contains no UFO material.
“Mineral Wells”2 pages
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421 Mathematically, the unknown parts of the table are estimated by minimizing the sum of squared differ- ences between the corresponding entries of the 1972 and 1970 I-O tables. If x(i,j) is the value of the sales of sector i to sector j in 1970 and y(i,j) is the same sales in 1972, then the following is minimized: I1 Tl 5 =_ E _E(X(i.i)—y(i,J'))’/y(i,j). l=l j=1 subject to the constraints that: (1) gJx(i,j)=C(j), and i=l (2) ;x(i,j)=R(i), where j=l C(j) is the column sum of sector j (gross output less value added and other estimated purchases) and R(i) is the row sum of sector i (gross output less final demand and other estimated sales). The minimum value of S is determined by the equations: (3) X(i.j)=y(iJ)(1+>\(i)+#(J')), Where )\(i) and p(i) are Lagrangian multipliers. Substituting each equation (3) into equations (1) and (2) produces a system of 2n-l linear equations in 2n-1 unknowns (the Lagrangian multipliers), where n is the number of sectors in the I-O table (19 in this case). The values of the Lagrangian multipliers can then be substituted back into each equation (3) to determine the actual value of each cell in the 1970 I-O table. For a detailed description of this and other methods of estimating I-O tables see John Pitzer, An Analysis of Technical Change in the Soviet Economy: An Application of Soviet Input-Output Tables (Ph.D. dissertation, American University, 1980). 167 Estimating GNP in Factor-Cost Prices The preceding sections have described the estimation of GNP in producers’ prices and a complete 1970 Soviet I-O table. In order to complete the conversion to factor-cost prices, it is necessary to eliminate the remaining elements of value added which do not represent a payment to a factor of production, esti- mate the capital stock of each sector, and replace Soviet profits with a capital charge which provides an equal rate of return in each sector. All of these changes directly affect value added. The I-O table is needed to compute the direct and indirect impact of the value-added changes on end-use GNP. In any I-O table, the sum of a sector’s material purchases and value added equal its gross output, or: n ()4) X(j)= Ex(i,j)+w(j)+d(j)+Z(j), where i=1 X(j) is the gross output of sector j, w(j) is the labor income earned in sector j, d(j) is the depreciation in sector j, and Z(j) is all other value added in sector j. As in previous estimates of Soviet GNP in factor-cost prices, it is assumed that w(i) and d(j) adequately represent their respective variables. It is desired to compute a uniform rate of return on each sector’s capital stock, r, and to reprice the output of all sectors to accommodate this uniform return. Equation (4) now becomes (5) P(i)X(i)= §D(i)X(iJl'l'WU)+d(.l)+FK(.l). i=l where p(i) is the price change required in sector i, and K_(i) is the capital stock of sector j. We make two further refinements. First, the capital stock of each sector is disaggregated to show how much was produced by the machinery, construction, Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
Not linked to a story yet.
FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 399 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.