Documents / FOIA release

USSR: Measures of Economic Growth and Development, 1950-80

Central Intelligence Agency · 1982-12-08 · 399 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Joint Committee Print, dated December 8, 1982, gathers studies that the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Intelligence prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress. It gives estimates of Soviet gross national product for 1950 to 1980, with indexes of industrial production, agricultural production and consumption, and explains the methods and data behind them. The foreword says official Soviet statistics inflate growth and that the CIA measures offer a more accurate picture. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 36 …In the USSR the collective farm, or kolkhoz, is part state and part cooperative. The land…
  • p. 47 …0.66e_ Consumer cooperatives 1.283 i Retained profits of consumer cooperatives 0.821 Tax on…
  • p. 50 …Hill, The Measurement of Real Product, The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 1971; R…
  • p. 103 …Net profits of consumer cooperatives were included with retail trade and public dining. Subsidies. This item…
  • p. 118 …and economic admin- istration, administrative organs of cooperative and social organizations,” for which employment and oth…
  • p. 119 …Social organi- zations include the administrative organs of the All- Union Society of Consumer Cooperatives, the…
  • p. 130 …The profits distributed to consumer cooperative members are now considered to be a transfer receipt rather…
  • p. 133 …Profits distributed to consumer cooperative members 0.027 9. Total income 217.206 Sources to this…
  • p. 134 …Profits distributed to consumer cooperative members. See CIA, GNP I970, p. 23. 9. Total income. This…
  • p. 135 …State, cooperative, and commission sales 141.096 (1)Fo0d 84.104 (2) Soft goods 42.734…
  • p. 137 …Charges paid by members of housing 0.075 cooperatives for maintenance lmputed gross rent on urban…
  • p. 138 …Taxes on land and buildings owned by individuals and cooperatives are from Gosb_vudzhet I972, p…
  • p. 139 …Retained profits of consumer cooperatives 0.821 d. Retained profits of other organizations 0.321 2…
  • p. 142 …Profits distributed to consumer 0.027 cooperative members 8.’C;solidate_d total outlays 215.841…
  • p. 147 …Consumer cooperatives 1.283 (1) Retained profits of consumer cooperatives 0.821 (2) Tax on income…
  • p. 160 …532) plus a share of the amortization deductions of consumer cooperatives. Altough consumer cooperatives are primarily…
  • p. 162 …532) and amortization deductions of consumer cooperatives on industrial capital (0.083 billion ru~ bles-—see…
  • p. 164 …retained profits and income taxes of consumer cooperatives and other organizations, respectively. 7. Total pra/its…
  • p. 257 …Other state purchasing orga- nizations are the Central Union of Consumer Cooper- atives, and the Ministries…
  • p. 286 …Review of I978 and Outlook for I97 9, Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service, April 1979, p…
  • p. 330 …exceeded the prices paid in state and cooperative retail outlets by an average of ~59 percent…
  • p. 331 …index of retail prices in state and cooperative outlets. The index which shows almost no change…
  • p. 332 …In coverage, it differs from the CIA index of consumption, mainly by inclusion of cooperative housing…
  • p. 335 …purchases of these items in state and cooperative retail outlets and in collective farm markets, including…
  • p. 339 …The index implicitly covers all goods purchased in state and cooperative retail out- lets, except those…
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
Mathematically, the unknown parts of the table are
estimated by minimizing the sum of squared differ-
ences between the corresponding entries of the 1972
and 1970 I-O tables. If x(i,j) is the value of the sales of
sector i to sector j in 1970 and y(i,j) is the same sales
in 1972, then the following is minimized:
I1 Tl
5 =_ E _E(X(i.i)—y(i,J'))’/y(i,j).
l=l j=1
subject to the constraints that:
(1) gJx(i,j)=C(j), and
i=l
(2) ;x(i,j)=R(i), where
j=l
C(j) is the column sum of sector j (gross output less
value added and other estimated purchases) and R(i) is
the row sum of sector i (gross output less final demand
and other estimated sales). The minimum value of S is
determined by the equations:
(3) X(i.j)=y(iJ)(1+>\(i)+#(J')), Where
)\(i) and p(i) are Lagrangian multipliers. Substituting
each equation (3) into equations (1) and (2) produces a
system of 2n-l linear equations in 2n-1 unknowns (the
Lagrangian multipliers), where n is the number of
sectors in the I-O table (19 in this case). The values of
the Lagrangian multipliers can then be substituted
back into each equation (3) to determine the actual
value of each cell in the 1970 I-O table. For a detailed
description of this and other methods of estimating
I-O tables see John Pitzer, An Analysis of Technical
Change in the Soviet Economy: An Application of
Soviet Input-Output Tables (Ph.D. dissertation,
American University, 1980).
167
Estimating GNP in Factor-Cost Prices
The preceding sections have described the estimation
of GNP in producers’ prices and a complete 1970
Soviet I-O table. In order to complete the conversion
to factor-cost prices, it is necessary to eliminate the
remaining elements of value added which do not
represent a payment to a factor of production, esti-
mate the capital stock of each sector, and replace
Soviet profits with a capital charge which provides an
equal rate of return in each sector. All of these
changes directly affect value added. The I-O table is
needed to compute the direct and indirect impact of
the value-added changes on end-use GNP.
In any I-O table, the sum of a sector’s material
purchases and value added equal its gross output, or:
n
()4) X(j)= Ex(i,j)+w(j)+d(j)+Z(j), where
i=1
X(j) is the gross output of sector j, w(j) is the labor
income earned in sector j, d(j) is the depreciation in
sector j, and Z(j) is all other value added in sector j.
As in previous estimates of Soviet GNP in factor-cost
prices, it is assumed that w(i) and d(j) adequately
represent their respective variables. It is desired to
compute a uniform rate of return on each sector’s
capital stock, r, and to reprice the output of all sectors
to accommodate this uniform return. Equation (4)
now becomes
(5) P(i)X(i)= §D(i)X(iJl'l'WU)+d(.l)+FK(.l).
i=l
where p(i) is the price change required in sector i, and
K_(i) is the capital stock of sector j.
We make two further refinements. First, the capital
stock of each sector is disaggregated to show how
much was produced by the machinery, construction,
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 399 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.