Documents / FOIA release

USSR: Measures of Economic Growth and Development, 1950-80

Central Intelligence Agency · 1982-12-08 · 399 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Joint Committee Print, dated December 8, 1982, gathers studies that the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Intelligence prepared for the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress. It gives estimates of Soviet gross national product for 1950 to 1980, with indexes of industrial production, agricultural production and consumption, and explains the methods and data behind them. The foreword says official Soviet statistics inflate growth and that the CIA measures offer a more accurate picture. The document contains no UFO material.

  • p. 4 …The volume contains a series of tables estimating the Soviet gross national product and its components…
  • p. 5 …quantified estimates of the value of Soviet gross national product (GNP), its rate of growth, its…
  • p. 6 …The Soviet indices of industrial and agricultural production are based on gross output rather than value…
  • p. 7 …For example, data on the amount of waste included in the gross output data of agricultural…
  • p. 8 …The measure shown represents “net output,” or gross output less products used by agriculture (seed and…
  • p. 9 …compendium on the Soviet eeonomV- “The Real Gross National Product of the U.S.S.R…
  • p. 10 …Contributions of Rush V. Greenslade ________ _________________-________ ____ __ 1x I. Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950—80.-______________________________ 3…
  • p. 12 …Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421 Part I. GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT OF THE USSR, 1950-80 By…
  • p. 14 …Turnover Taxes as a Share of Gross Output in Industry, 1972 6. Subsidies on Agricultural Products…
  • p. 15 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the Soviet Union in Established Prices, 39 by…
  • p. 16 …of Value Added in Agriculture B-8. Gross Output, Total Material Purchases, and Value Added in…
  • p. 17 …I Soviet Gross National Product in Established Priceskby End Use, I if I970 D-6. I…
  • p. 18 …An International Comparison, 1981 Gross National Product of the USSR: An International Comparison, 1982 Soviet Economic…
  • p. 19 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Gross National Product of the USSR, 1950-80 Introduction This paper presents…
  • p. 20 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product in Established Prices, 1955-1975,” Jahrbuch der Wirtsc/la/I Osteuropas…
  • p. 27 …GNP for the Soviet Union and of gross domestic product (GDP) for selected OECD countries.” For…
  • p. 34 …Lee, “USSR Gross National Product," p. 413; and Becker, 1969, p. 128. difference between the growth…
  • p. 35 …conducted on a net rather than a gross basis. The enterprise is expected to be managed…
  • p. 41 …the business sector and are included in gross private business investment. The second US account shows…
  • p. 43 …On the other hand, the tax amounts to 30 percent of the gross output of the…
  • p. 44 …Turnover taxes were 30 and 56 percent of the gross outputs of the sugar and other…
  • p. 45 …The capital stock data used in this study are gross of depreciation. Approved for Release: 2019…
  • p. 47 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 8 Billion Rubles Gross National Product of the Soviet Union ' in…
  • p. 48 …The row and column sums are determined as each sector’s gross output less, respec- tively…
  • p. 49 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Table 10 Percent 1970 Soviet Gross National Product by End Use W…
  • p. 52 …Therefore, value added is computed as a residual—the difference between gross output and current material…
  • p. 53 …Therefore, if in- dexes of gross output and current inputs are both available, the gross output…
  • p. 56 …Each subbranch index measures the gross output of an I-O sector by summing the physical…
  • p. 57 …The material-input index is less desirable than a double deflation or gross output index, but…
  • p. 58 …2019/07/19 C05210421 Appendix A ' Soviet Gross National Product, 1950-80 This appendix presents the…
  • p. 59 …5 0.5 0.6 0.6 Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8…
  • p. 60 …4 ._ §l§5QfI.i2j§§5 1.0 Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 61 …4 1.4 1.4 1.4 Gross national product 383.3 398.2 405.7…
  • p. 62 …0 5.2 3.7 2.7___ Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5.0…
  • p. 63 …8 7.6 5.8 4.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 64 …5.1 4.; 2.9 7.7“ ' Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 65 …2 3.4 0.8 1 4 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 66 …9 0.3 2.5 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 67 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 68 …3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 69 …3 51.2 55.1 58.3 _ Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 71 …7 134.1 135.2 137.1 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 72 …27.5 24.. ?6i5j_; Gross national product 133.6 137.7 145.8 153.4 160…
  • p. 73 …1 43.7 45.9 s9.7_‘ Gross national product 232.3 245.3 254.5…
  • p. 75 …4.5 1.1 5.9 -3.1 Gross national product 5.5 5.9 5…
  • p. 76 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.1 5.9 5.2…
  • p. 77 …0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 5.6 3.8 -1.1…
  • p. 78 …g 4.3 0.0 0.0 Gross national product 3.9 1.9 7.3…
  • p. 79 …1 28.1 29.1 30.2 Gross national product 741.7 752.2 784.0…
  • p. 80 …9 36.6 31.8 Ww3§’.98W Gross national product 1,083.8 1,124.6…
  • p. 81 …1 46.1 46.9 46.8 Gross national product 1,578.5 1,624.6…
  • p. 82 …3.2 7* 1.4 1.3 Gross national product 3.7 4.0 3.5…
  • p. 83 …1 14.0 13.8 13.5 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 84 …8 13.4 13.3 7 17717 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 85 …4 9.6 8.1 6.9 Gross national product 100.0 100.0 100.0…
  • p. 86 …31.7 65.3______s.9 g Gross national product 34.9 35.9 38.0…
  • p. 87 …9 98.2 103.1 89.1 Gross national product 60.6 64.0 66.4…
  • p. 88 …8 110.4 93.7 81.8 Gross national product 100.0 103.9 105.9…
  • p. 89 …Subtracting the deflated material pur- chases from the deflated gross output produces value added in constant…
  • p. 90 …The ratio of material inputs (gross output less NMP) to gross output declined slowly in this…
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421
d. Municipal and related services. (1) Culture outlays are estimated
at 1.180 billion rub|es——the sum of wages (0.839 billion rubles),
social insurance deductions (0.046 billion rubles), and other current
outlays (0.295 billion rubles). The wage bill is derived from
employment (0.824 million—Narkhoz 1978, p. 366) and the aver-
age wage rate (84.8 rubles per month-—Ibid, p. 372). Social
insurance deductions are calculated at 5.5 percent of the wage bill
(CIA, GNP I970, p. 52). Other current outlays are assumed to be
one-fourth of total current outlays.
(2) Municipal services are estimated at 0.628 billion rub1es—the
sum of wages (0.450 billion rubles), social insurance deductions
(0.021 billion rubles), and other current outlays (0.157 billion
rubles). The wage bill is derived from employment (0.397 million)
and the average wage rate (94.5 rubles per month). Employment is
derived as 13 percent of the employment of the housing-communal
economy (3.052 mi11ion—Narkhoz 1978, p. 366). The wage rate is
assumed to be equal to that of the total housing-communal sector
(Ibid, p. 373). Social insurance deductions are calculated as 4.7
percent of the wage bill (CIA, GNP 1970, p. 54). Other current
outlays are assumed to be one-fourth of total current outlays.
(3) Civilian police outlays are estimated as 1.761 billion rubles—the
sum of wages (1.235 billion rubles), social insurance deductions
(0.086 billion rubles), and other current outlays (0.440 billion
rubles). The wage bill is derived from employment (0.675 million)
and an estimated wage rate (152.5 rubles per month). Employment
is estimated to be 67.6 percent of the Narkhoz employment
category “other branches of material production" (0.998 million—
Narkhoz I978, p. 366). The wage rate is assumed to be 25 percent
above the average wage rate of all state workers and employees
(122.0 rubles per month—Ibid). This assumption results from the
calculation of the implicit wage rate for the forestry and other
branches of material production sectors, the two sectors for which
wage data are not published in the Narkhoz. This type of calcula-
tion is subject to rounding errors, but a study of several years shows
that the implicit wage rate is consistently higher than the average
for all state workers and employees.
Social insurance deductions are assumed to be 7.0 percent of the
wage bill. Other current outlays are assumed to be one-fourth of
total current outlays.
3.Gross Investment
a. Fixed capital. (1) Machinery and equipment is estimated at
26.053 billion rubles: the sum of new fixed investment in machinery
and equipment (25.300 billion rubles), changes in warehouse stocks
of equipment requiring installation (-0.137 billion rubles), and the
acquisition of equipment by budget institutions (0.890 billion
rubles). New fixed investment is reported in Narkhoz 1972, (p. 474)
as the “equipment, instruments, and inventory,” component of
capital investment. This value is said to be in 1969 estimate prices.
139
How those prices compare to 1970 prices is uncertain. The
wholesale price index for the output of the machine-building and
metalworking branch of industry shows no change in 1970 com-
pared with 1969. Western studies have suggested that there is a
persistent upward trend in price, but no precise estimates of yearly
changes are available. Here it is assumed that there was no change
between 1969 estimate prices and 1970 expenditures.
The change in warehouse stocks of equipment requiring installa-
tion is from CIA, GNP I970, p. 55. The acquisition of equipment
by budget-supported institutions is not included in Soviet invest-
ment data. This value was estimated by increasing the reported
value for outlays by union-republic budgets (0.6506 billion rubles-
Gosbyudzhet I972, p. 78) to include outlays from the union budget.
In 1970 union-republic budgets financed 73.1 percent of total
outlays on edumtion, culture, health, physical culture, science, and
administration (Ibid, pp. 33, 34, 60, 69, and 72). It is assumed that
this relationship is also true for the acquisition of equipment.
(2) Construction and other capital outlays are estimated as the
difference between total expenditures on construction and other
capital outlays (59.8 billion rubles) and private expenditures on
housing construction (1.636 billion rubles—table D-2, item 5,a).
Total outlays on construction and other capital outlays are derived
as the difference between the gross output of the construction sector
(67.6 billion Narkhoz I 978, p. 41) and estimated expenditures on
capital repair of structures (7.8 billion rubles—appendix C).
(3) Net additions to livestock in the public sector are derived in
same manner as in the private sector (table D-1, item 2,c,[21). The
calculation is shown below.
Valuation of the Net Additions
to Public-Sector Livestock
Inventories, 1970
(1) (2)
Inventory of Animals
(thousand head)
(3) (4) (5)
Net Additions to
Livestock Inventories
End
1969
End
1970
Thousand Rubles Billion
Head Per Rubles
Head
Cattle 70,173 74,212 4,099 442 1.812
glogs 42,225 50,921 8,696 113 ____1.so4
Sheep and
goats
104.138 110,241 6,103 37 0.226
Poultry 230,213 276,192 45,919 is ‘"'6.m“"
Total 3.772
Approved for Release: 2019/07/19 C05210421

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 399 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.