David E. Hanlon Ralph Orcutt Edmund X. Klipa (Possible Contact by the Senate Select Committee Staff)

;""'ii"““*T
'1
la
5
1
‘-"3/
l
i
Ii
h
:1
2
<
4|
I
i
5|
‘.
1
J
I1
J
\
l
A
4
-
-/7
W .
'1 ,,
a r.
4w*'A-Ilh 4 l,
in
1
\ 7
*
‘II
"*1
i
'/.-. 6’:
\
Q
" 3*
'
*~
$x
;
‘%'~._
6'1
£2. -1*,
‘:3
*"" " ‘/J/‘av
i
-z.-I
#§fi»~/ *"‘ i H . L -
4
‘-__ ,5 -
I
_. ,,'
— ____
g,
.
_
"¢WLLyJ$@H¢ @1L,%)under OPIC contract in order o complete ITT claim)
ll
*‘,_ e) _
* <'“*'&b“’ General Counsel/OPIC from Lawrence Houston
3
4.
p
‘fir
L __\;{‘.{.1' ;' vrrd 7'5’
Tab B (Cont'd)
Memo by Jonathan G. Hankc 21 Jun l9T3
Subj: ITT ‘
"\. r“
-
~. ,~.
r~. I‘
/1 ‘
ti ‘/1
Tab C: Did the Agency provide adequate and correct 3 Sep l9Th
information to the Overseas Private Investment
Corporation (OPIC) for use in considering the ITT claim?
r,, ;;
'
Memo for Record by Richard H. Lansdale (OGC T2~O538) lh Apr 1972
W ’ Subj: Overseas Private Investment Corporation Inquiry
Regarding ITT Activity _
.¢ »
Letter to Lawrence R. Houston, General Counsel, 20 Oct l9T2
.*:jji_Z/. 4
‘H _
;“:¢£ijJ;&A¢g/4~ from Marshall T. Mays, General Counsel/OPIC
*§*G‘*'f'_ 4
7 I p (re OPIC insurance contract with ITT -~ need, in
/v'¢5f~5*"b”’#”° writing, "all reliable information available
1vv2t'”1‘“¢*””3 to the intelligence community On the activities
,f;Z/1 9
'
of ITT which could constitute ‘provocation’
:<Ȣ .1 y ~- ?Letter of reply to Marshall T. Mays, Esqf, 2? Oct 1912
/Z?’ (0cc’72-l58h) -
9&¢fi (for info available to the intelligence community
with respect to the activities of ITT in Chile,
i
contact agencies represented there —— State and DIA)
7flTZ@1-V'35i"H/y Memo for Record by Richard H. Lansdale, Associate 29 Jan 1973
@a.~;QuLfl$§;- General Counsel (\OGC'T3-0153)
~,»r-;~=:.=/
, ,\ ,
x at
i
in r//'u' I ,
"
, 2
‘ re -
fl,;171r '
Subj: OPIC—ITT Matter —~ Second Conversation with
g»£//\".»{_&=" ' " ~
J ’
"
° Jg;,fll/ Mark Feldman
12 Feb 1973
~
Letter to James R. Schlesinger, DCI, from.Bradford 21 Feb l9T3
Mills, OPIC (ER 73~957)
'
(re whether Roy Broe would be available as witness
should dispute arise between OPIC & ITT concerning
ITT's claim alleging the expropriation of ITT's -
subsidiary, the Chile Telephone Company) "
l
J
5 Mar 1973'
-I Letter to Bradford Mills, President, OPIC, from
m,_, .
V
. Lawrence R. Houston, General Counsel -
,”¢¢§;yA@flQ1€flm“tre Broe's availability for questioning; ITT/CIA
.je4;¢/w contacts re Chile) ,
.
K ii» *.\_ ‘M \ “,\ ‘*3.
.3 V
-¢//
uW~L_Z77\7*fl Memo for Record by Richard H. Lansdale (occ 73-0378) 6 Mar 1973
Q'¢@g_fl/2 Subj: ITT—ChileI
1":
;"
-.
3,:
\
Q-
.
'
~r\
_4n;e;a¥§-
.
eilnlt
i
5
\
i
I
i