Documents / FOIA release

David E. Hanlon Ralph Orcutt Edmund X. Klipa (Possible Contact by the Senate Select Committee Staff)

Central Intelligence Agency · 1975-09-29 · 515 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Central Intelligence Agency file, dated 29 September 1975, collects Office of Security memoranda written while the Senate Select Committee was investigating the Agency. Staff were told to alert former employees about possible committee contact over Project MERRIMAC/RESISTANCE, and the file answers committee questions about Hayes International and Bay of Pigs pilots. It also records staff interviews about CIA name checks at NSA and a Justice Department request for records on domestic electronic surveillance. It contains no material on UFOs.

  • p. 15 …30 October 1974 ~- Approved through Top Secret with access to Headquarters building for a six-month…
  • p. 32 …How completed work was returned to Headquarters; and F. Did I believe that any of my…
  • p. 160 …seek ta uhtain IRS iqifirmfifilfin withsut privy Headquarters approval. In qencral, QKSQS Wflflrfi th@ Afifincy has…
  • p. 178 …WVK ' § ~ n 1 \ v \ WOFFICE OF 0Rxc1n Headquarters K i I | ‘ ' 1 \ v 1 0\ REPORT…
  • p. 209 …John Dempsey "Review Staff i Headquarters Langley, Virginia ~ Dear Mr. Dempsey: ik in a few days…
  • p. 289 …If such a contingency is discovered before the Director's arrival at the restaurant, Headquarters should…
  • p. 417 …8 December 1972 at Headquarters (PUBRIG’s detailed 8 Jan 73 ideas on situation in Chile…
  • p. 488 …to raview the attache& documants here in Headquarters in the prasence sf reprasentatives from bath tha…
  • p. 499 …Klipa's house, enroute back to Headquarters, both Mr. Rourke and Ms. Grau indicated to the…
  • p. 511 …be made“ available for DOJ review at Headquarters O 2. Since there may be confusion about…
S‘
"u"{ -“$1. 2'1""!
‘ZED Ii L-luau-Q
—nLP>-¢QY¢z'2s9._
on BRANDY at the conclusion of his luncheon with the Director.
.?&TYHc?E':Eé"§E~§1TFE ifi'~1€,’“EhE¥E?ii§'$vZy~'tZ5._Hiéé§RE-E? BRAN D‘1*"”é“_'"
potential reaction to the Director's proposal. But one thing is
certain, that being the meeting involving the Director will -
surely alert BRANDY to this Agency's interest into, at least, J
a phaaenof his activities. It is, therefore, irnperative to obtain
cornprehensive inforrnation as to BRANDY's conceréifto the
Agency's incursion into his professional or personal operations,
desired that, on 1?a-";-e%eaee=**'*-- " 1-1972, SUGAR coverage be ‘
S-
maintained on CORDLAL and EGGNOG since, if there is to be .
6. In conjungétiopawitli the BRANDY coverage, it is '
/any counter-surveillance, audio or photographic operations
agjainst the Director, either of these individuals would lneces's'ai'ilyi
play a xnajor role. _
'
7. In view of the Director's coricern over the proposecl
BRANDY book, SUGAR coverage should be predicated on obtaining
any i1lfOI‘;i‘11al2iO11 relating to the possible collaborator or publisher
of this work. It is thought that the Centralpoint for this segment
of _BRAl\IDY's activity may be in NewLYork\CIty and, at such times
he may travel to that location, it is hoped that a suificient nmnber
of the SUGAR team rnombers be able to accoxnpany him on such
journeys. Arrangements have already been made with NYFO to
render support to the applicable WFO SUGAR tearn members who
rnay be required to conduct operations in the New York City area.
Former CIA Cover Employee
Chief, Support Branch
CSD .
'
3 y
‘
2"='"'"rs on r 1 ,xi.’ ‘LC. \\ ‘I’?
3!. '23..()\
-r~
»/W

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 515 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.