Documents / FOIA release

David E. Hanlon Ralph Orcutt Edmund X. Klipa (Possible Contact by the Senate Select Committee Staff)

Central Intelligence Agency · 1975-09-29 · 515 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Central Intelligence Agency file, dated 29 September 1975, collects Office of Security memoranda written while the Senate Select Committee was investigating the Agency. Staff were told to alert former employees about possible committee contact over Project MERRIMAC/RESISTANCE, and the file answers committee questions about Hayes International and Bay of Pigs pilots. It also records staff interviews about CIA name checks at NSA and a Justice Department request for records on domestic electronic surveillance. It contains no material on UFOs.

  • p. 3 …Hanlon that we have been fully cooperating with the Senate Select Committee and have furnished them…
  • p. 19 …Subject was very cooperative during the interview‘ disp_lay_e§._g._»wlllingness"to"cooperéfiie din" évérywwayf…
  • p. 44 …specific projects or equipment; Hughes enterprises have cooperated with the Agency in the placement of several…
  • p. 46 …pers in cbver ppsjfiié“§€'€ Hughes enterfirises have cooperated wiffi thé Agenqy in placing a number of…
  • p. 48 …Both comnanies have been com- pletely cooperative, and they have supplied a wealth of » information over…
  • p. 83 …Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. / ; K / Z2/v (/’%;;dames Quinn H t/
  • p. 221 …rule that true names of cover mechanisms, cooperating individuals, and corporations would not be provided. On…
  • p. 239 …SAG's Senate/House soft file entitled "Cooperating Companies," as well as within the Office of…
  • p. 258 …It is understood that Itelc does not require any fee or charge for its cooperation in…
  • p. 325 …Your cooperation in meeting this deadline would be appreciated. ‘M - 4/tn‘; - 2 ‘_ -;,'L,,,.;c,,:~;",_,f…
  • p. 350 …2d1*i:;>.r’,~i- 31:’: r’ Snbj: Cooperation with CIA of ITT Employee "ex ,_.,,»- '/6'" 2…
  • p. 352 …iairzst him; financial assistance to RADIO COOPER- - 1 i i A‘%IVA. denied permission to leave…
  • p. 353 …21 I/12.1" 73 Colby . (Re cooperation with CIA oi‘ ITT Employee Bernard. Poirier.) - ~» Memo…
  • p. 364 …progress in getting Amer- icon business to cooperate in some way to bring on economic choas…
  • p. 403 …Multinational 1 ' Companies; need for International Labor Cooperation; predominance of Ameritun Companies ~ anti-US ton?) '39…
  • p. 435 …Mar 73 ' 3H¢M%fb%r77v _JSUBJ: Cooperation w/CIA of ITT Employee Bernard l 1…
  • p. 437 …e'>z»w:-Q » ~£>§/éfikffiq/G SUBJ: Cooperation w/CIA ofAITT Employee Bernard Poirier i ;QsU…
  • p. 441 …Chile—~—-re possibility of Allende winning congres- sional vote; armed forces uprising; cooperation by U.S…
  • p. 499 …Klipa was somewhat less than cooperative and despite reassurances concerning the purpose of the interview apparently…
  • p. 510 …Your assistance and cooperation at your earliest convenience will be appreciated. :1fiiEZ:ihK!‘I, Richard L…
  • p. 514 …Your assistance and cooperation at your earliest convenience will be appreciated. - :%§g}re§Fl{:)'5 K…
fi_,._ 1,‘: 7.-
5
'*" Bu! Hui i:.v;..iu:li'a3C ‘F’
u. 18 May 1972 - No problems.
v. 19 May 1972 — No problems; this indicates a false
Jack Anderson story rather than confirming a real Agency
report. _
'
w. 22 May 1972 - There may be a problem in reference
to "Soviet Navy Delivery Systems" and the items at the
bottom of the first page of the Ininutes. Otherwise it seems
O. K. The last item in the minutes on SALT merely reveal
the subject but not the substantive contents and probably is
releasable.
x. 23 May 1972 - No problems with the three marked
items, although OLC may feel that the first of them raises
the "advice and counsel" issue.
y. 25 May 1972 - No problems.
z. 1 June 1972 - No problems.
aa. 7 June 1972 - No problems.
bb. 8 June 1972 — The DDI should comment on the
reference to a specific OCI report. N0 problem with
reference t‘o a Jack Anderson column.
cc. 9 June 1972 - The reference to the Jack Anderson
column indicates that the reference to av\"intercept" is
probably correct. It raises the question of confirming
a COMINT activity. The reference to Britishrconcern is
an additional revelation in terms of US—UK intelligence
relations . _
'
dd. 26 June 1972 — Specific reference to USIB estimates
may have to be sanitized.
ee. 27 .TuI1~e 1972 — While publicity of the existence of
.forma1 briefing material on the SALT subject may lead to
FOIA requests, it is assumed that their continued classi-
fication and the sensitivity of the subject would result in a
denial. I don't see how We can withhold it. No problem
with the last iteln on the first page of the minutes.
-4-
(‘*;“‘;- 3'15 17“; =r\~t__ 3"-{*1 5"." .-“Q
it/H1"“"'§i ;~;>J:n -1

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 515 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.