Documents / FOIA release

David E. Hanlon Ralph Orcutt Edmund X. Klipa (Possible Contact by the Senate Select Committee Staff)

Central Intelligence Agency · 1975-09-29 · 515 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Central Intelligence Agency file, dated 29 September 1975, collects Office of Security memoranda written while the Senate Select Committee was investigating the Agency. Staff were told to alert former employees about possible committee contact over Project MERRIMAC/RESISTANCE, and the file answers committee questions about Hayes International and Bay of Pigs pilots. It also records staff interviews about CIA name checks at NSA and a Justice Department request for records on domestic electronic surveillance. It contains no material on UFOs.

  • p. 3 …Hanlon that we have been fully cooperating with the Senate Select Committee and have furnished them…
  • p. 19 …Subject was very cooperative during the interview‘ disp_lay_e§._g._»wlllingness"to"cooperéfiie din" évérywwayf…
  • p. 44 …specific projects or equipment; Hughes enterprises have cooperated with the Agency in the placement of several…
  • p. 46 …pers in cbver ppsjfiié“§€'€ Hughes enterfirises have cooperated wiffi thé Agenqy in placing a number of…
  • p. 48 …Both comnanies have been com- pletely cooperative, and they have supplied a wealth of » information over…
  • p. 83 …Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. / ; K / Z2/v (/’%;;dames Quinn H t/
  • p. 221 …rule that true names of cover mechanisms, cooperating individuals, and corporations would not be provided. On…
  • p. 239 …SAG's Senate/House soft file entitled "Cooperating Companies," as well as within the Office of…
  • p. 258 …It is understood that Itelc does not require any fee or charge for its cooperation in…
  • p. 325 …Your cooperation in meeting this deadline would be appreciated. ‘M - 4/tn‘; - 2 ‘_ -;,'L,,,.;c,,:~;",_,f…
  • p. 350 …2d1*i:;>.r’,~i- 31:’: r’ Snbj: Cooperation with CIA of ITT Employee "ex ,_.,,»- '/6'" 2…
  • p. 352 …iairzst him; financial assistance to RADIO COOPER- - 1 i i A‘%IVA. denied permission to leave…
  • p. 353 …21 I/12.1" 73 Colby . (Re cooperation with CIA oi‘ ITT Employee Bernard. Poirier.) - ~» Memo…
  • p. 364 …progress in getting Amer- icon business to cooperate in some way to bring on economic choas…
  • p. 403 …Multinational 1 ' Companies; need for International Labor Cooperation; predominance of Ameritun Companies ~ anti-US ton?) '39…
  • p. 435 …Mar 73 ' 3H¢M%fb%r77v _JSUBJ: Cooperation w/CIA of ITT Employee Bernard l 1…
  • p. 437 …e'>z»w:-Q » ~£>§/éfikffiq/G SUBJ: Cooperation w/CIA ofAITT Employee Bernard Poirier i ;QsU…
  • p. 441 …Chile—~—-re possibility of Allende winning congres- sional vote; armed forces uprising; cooperation by U.S…
  • p. 499 …Klipa was somewhat less than cooperative and despite reassurances concerning the purpose of the interview apparently…
  • p. 510 …Your assistance and cooperation at your earliest convenience will be appreciated. :1fiiEZ:ihK!‘I, Richard L…
  • p. 514 …Your assistance and cooperation at your earliest convenience will be appreciated. - :%§g}re§Fl{:)'5 K…
.p
CU%'vi' 5"!»-'...z"»JiiE.1""i.‘i..
~.,,,,;" %'
m. 12 April 1972 — No problems.
n. 14 April. 1972 - The first item identifies CIA
reports and should at least be sanitized. The next three
marked items do not appear on their face to present
-problems, although D/NIO may wish to review the reference
to an ONE memorandum. on Chile, publication of which
might expose it to public attention.
0. 19 April. 1972 — I would think that a discussion of the
newspaper stori.es can be released. The next item that is
marked raises the question of international relations and
the very fact that the issue was raised puts it in a special
category and should be considered carefully. »
p. Zl April. 1972 — No problems with the item on
Ma-rchetti, although as in other instances the appearance
of Thuermer's name presents a question.
q. 1 May 1972 - No problems. Of the four items
marked on the second page of the minutes the only question
that I have is the use of the name o.f Brittenham. If
released, and I assurne it will be, Brittenham should
probably be advised.
r. 3 May 1972 — The twoiterns on the second page of
the minutes have to do with Congressional hearings and
are releasable. The marked item on the Moscow signals
merely reveals interest on a subject that has subsequently
received considerable publicity, as Well as confirmation. -
s. 4 May 1972 -— No problem with the first and last
items except the question on Thuermer's name. The '
items on sensitive ORD and TSD contracts (the 5th item
in the minutes) present problems,‘ but possibly can be
sanitized.
t. 17 May l972 - No problems, except for the reference
to specific budgetary figures and the NRO reference.
-3-
rx .1
“-J"~ .- I é 1‘-. 5*.-*1 F.
____\p.>1‘g\n1"'F./;.'.i.“'i.l l

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 515 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.