David E. Hanlon Ralph Orcutt Edmund X. Klipa (Possible Contact by the Senate Select Committee Staff)

gt-6 =.-';‘- 1|
‘
1--I--4 .
-
.‘
. -
.
,
_ '
_. tr _
‘b _ =.-- _.~;»-1 -.- 2;. '1 I; 2 “N;.
-, v , . . .
\ '.' 1 ’\
| \ ‘I
_1___-|_'1 1\ ~
r
D
. . -
,
-
»
.
- , '
.
_
I ‘ .
r
SUBJECT: ‘BUTANE ~ \;~r¢\.~t<.- I‘./h<Hl<§1=-ii? ‘ ’
7-
On 5 April _l§'7Z, ~a Qonfidential Iniormant reviewedBU'I‘ANE‘s income tax forms from 1961} throught197l and advisedthat there “appeared to be no serious discrepancies- ‘
-
\. .
-
From September 1969, when BU'I'Al}?E resigned from theAgency, through December 1971 BUTANE's total reported incomewas less than $7, O00. "This consisted of a payment in l970_ofunder $7, O00 from a publishing firm lmovrn as Granada, Ltd. , _
in England and a reported income of approrcirnately $900 in 1971.An investigation is being conducted to obtain information regard-»ing“ Granda, Ltd. The only other income reported was approI~ri~rnately $4, 800 in bo"th'*-1970 and 1971 received by BUTA_NE.‘*s "wifefrorn the Fairfax‘ County Hospital where she be came employed].a.te in 1969. _.
At thetirne the above in.-forrnation was obtained, our Informantwas extremely interested in the fact that BUTANE had authored ‘
and published a book but still only reported a total incorzle of lessthan $7, O00 for 1976-. and 1971. In this regard: our source wouldbe readyjo conduct, at our request, 2. routide audit of BAU'I'.£\.1‘~IE"si::~co'r:1e tax for the ‘Dash three vearsl '
t‘
.T .
.
, -
\
\\;
D’ .
I
1
._!-,5
T
I
(- -
81.’:
E_Q._-|MPnE'r CL ?‘v'-Q0-'1&']"