David E. Hanlon Ralph Orcutt Edmund X. Klipa (Possible Contact by the Senate Select Committee Staff)

Mr Waiter G Rourke
wi
2. 7 JUN 2975
Oféice of Asoistant Commissions? {Inspection}
Internal Security Division
Investigation Branch
Internal Revenue Service
Washington, D.C. 20224
Dear Mr. Rourke:
Pursuant to our convorsatiooo on 13 June 1975, the
following information is pyovioci in regard to those
instances whore the Central Intolzigenco Agency's Office
of Security has obtained federal flax information from the
Internal Revenue Service.
Attached hereto as Tabs A through K are copies of the
pertinent portions of Office of Soourity investigative
reports andfor memoranda, which oovtain to each of those
instances whore IRS information hao been obtained. However
it should be noted that in manv
tioc coxtaincd in thcs; rs;ort;
not reflect the extent to which
been made available.
I
of these cases the informa-
io quite limited and docs
the IRS tax records had
Further, there is a discrepancy in the number of
cases where the Agency has received federal tax informa-
tion concerning an individual or firm as indicated in
the report prepared by the Presiiootial Commission to
Investigate the Central Intelligence Agency. Due to a
typographical error on a'summary chart provided by the
Agency to the Presidential Commiosion, which numerically
listed the entire spectrum of cosos of "Alleged Illegal
Domestic Activities,“ two cases_woro listed on the chart
as "IRS reviews,“ when in fact they should have been
listod under the "mail covers" section of that chart. 4
As a result, there are actually only fourteen (14) instances,
as opposed to the sixteen (16) rmportod by the Presidential
Commission. In addition, fiho foortoen IRS reviews occurred
0 5 5' .3
cusszruan av
sxmrr mom crzmtrm DECL.-XSSIFIC.-H3034
SCHEDULE OF E. 0. 11:25.2, EXEMPTION .-_'_;'n_"4;1;~;‘-,3’;
§ 53(1)» (Z), (3) or (4) (circle one ur mores)
AUTUMATICALLY DEU.»'\b2ur!k.iJ OH
B Impossi{>l_ev to Determine 1
(=1
i
uleu Imp-ulalble, insert dug n gvug}