Documents / FOIA release
This CIA FOIA release, approved in 2022, holds a June 5, 2006 appeal from Larry W. Bryant to the CIA Records-Release Panel, along with the agency's replies. Bryant challenges the CIA's refusal to treat him as a news media requester in two requests: one on John Joseph McCarthy Jr. and PROJECT CHERRY, the other on Philip J. Corso. The CIA's letters report no McCarthy records and no Corso records in its holdings. An enclosed UFO magazine column discusses the FBI's file on Philip J. Klass.
“William Moore”2 pages
Velrltlgil - FOIA Appeal re CIA-maintained McCarthy Records and Corso Records 6/5/()6 4;45 PM * Approved for Release: 2022/08/29 C01333876. 1 / 4+»/r»»m '-my W» W" (Add to address book) (Add to recent addresses) (A dd to blacklist) _~ om 6/5/20062:30:27am 2% MN \ Q A“ 3: BU T» Subject FOIA Appeal re CIA-rmintained McCarthy Records and Corso Records r ;~ esrjmssrriiinsets as-trillI.-asareai ,M~v=aw*¢*s=r=-is I-leaders‘-3 lnline Images Enable Scfiptsn Open in New Window Enable Offsite lmages* 1s;h.sn.s.e,xis.y~rl TO: Chairman CIA Records-Release Panel C/O Scott Koch, lnfomration and Privacy Coordinator U. S. Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 20505 FROM: @ W. Bryant DATE: June 5, 2006 Your FOIA coordinator Koch's letters to me of May 3 t, 2006, and May 26, 2006, have made it even clearer to me why your agency has received the George Washington University-based National Security Archive's Rosemary Award (for your demonstrated disdain for the U. S. Freedom of Information Act's inherent support of the publio's right-to-know). Accordingly, in order to help counter that disdain and to advance the public's interest/benefit in knowing the darker side of your agency's policies/programs/practices, I hereby appeal Mr. Koch's actions taken via the above-cited letters, while also sewing notice that your denial of my appeal will heighten my resolve to seek judicial remedy therefor. My prevailing in that lawsuit would require your agency to reimburse me my attorney's fees. First of all, your final response (May 31, 2006) to my Aug. 8, 2004, request No. F-2004-01956, re former U. S. Army captain John Joseph McCarthy, .Ir., errs in denying my status as an independent writer entitled to full waiver of records-search fees. What's more, had your records searcher conducted a search of all records pertaining to the CIA-managed, clandestine, Vietnam-era operation called PROJECT CHERRY, he would've discovered that McCarthy had been assigned to that project For background infomration on that assignment, please peruse McCarthy's current-events-blog website Irttp://johnmccarthy90066.tripod/idLhtml . As McCarthy's blog documents, his (Army-CIA-compelled) role in PROJECT CHERRY led to his becoming the fall-guy for your agency's ill-conceived and illicit application of CHERRY actions/assets against the Cambodian govemment. Such official malfeasance by ANY U. S. agency during wartime would by definition have permanent value to the public's understanding and evaluation of that agency's conduct past, present, and future. My expected lawsuit, therefore, would seek your agency's production of a Vaughn index to detemrine why Mr. Koch has chosen not to search all CHERRY-related records pertaining to McCarthy's case. That request for a Vaughn index also would seek a copy of the entire FOIA case files on all other McCarthy-related FOIA requests processed to date by your agency. The lawsuit also would request that the court conduct an in-camera inspection of all CHERRY-related records pertaining to McCarthy. Since Mr. McCarthy's web log (a.k.a. “blog") qualifies as a news (and information) medium widely available to military-affairs researchers, political analysts, scholars, cultural activists, congressmen, historians, and jurists worldwide, it enhances my ability to share my writings and research finding on such national~security matters as the McCarthy Saga. His story, incidentally, figures in my current First Amendment lawsuit of Bryant v. Rumsfeld, et aI., whereby I'm challenging certain military commanders’ censorship of a series of whistleblower-solicitation advertisements I've sent -- as an independent writer-researcher -- for publication in various postlbase newspapers. In this regard, the U. S. District Conn for the , District of Columbia has acknowledged my status as an independent writer entitled to have his first Amendment claims of freedom-of-speech/freedom-of-press properly adjudicated. In the second matter at issue here (my May 4, 2006, FOIA request No. F-2006~0l045, by which I seek a copy of all CIA-generated and V I CIA~received records pertaining to the late Army Lt. Col. (Ret.) Philip James Corso and his associations, activities, congressional (b)(6) b)(6) (b)(6 tp://webmailravtel.net/webmailcgi g Page | on Approved for Release: 2022/08/29 C01333876 I < )
FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 10 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.