Documents / FOIA release

Collection of Assorted Newspaper and Magazine Clippings: Jfk Assassination, Conspiracy Theories, Etc

Central Intelligence Agency · 2025-06-12 · 83 pages · text by OCR

This is a Central Intelligence Agency release dated 2025-06-12 under the JFK Act. It collects 1975 newspaper and magazine clippings. They include Mark Harris's New York Times Magazine essay on a UCLA "Conspiracy in America" conference and the conspiracy-theory mindset, a Jack Anderson column on stalled CIA reform, and wire reports of Richard Helms calling CBS newsman Daniel Schorr "Killer" after he testified to the Rockefeller Commission. There is also an essay on power and a publishing item about Philip Agee's book.

  • p. 2 …We may never know more than we know now of the truth of our several major…
  • p. 3 …order to be able to say, "I never take vacations." It is part of the suffering…
  • p. 7 …He would have told me about it and I know damn well he never told me…
  • p. 8 …Miller said he talked to Houston but never about a plot involved the CIA and the…
  • p. 11 …far as I know the CIA was never responsible for the assassination of any foreign leader…
  • p. 14 …he said he was positive that "I never had any part in planning any details. Similarly…
  • p. 23 …Korea or the Philippines? Even Americans who never endorsed "the domino theory" must understand that we…
  • p. 26 …I never thought the Dallas police were telling us the entire truth. Neither was the FBI…
  • p. 27 …McCloy, now a New York lawyer, says, "I never saw a case more completely proven." Staff…
  • p. 31 …We never really detached anyone for this. We weren't really serious." After reporters from the…
  • p. 36 …The doubters, moreover, have never harmonized their own doubts about whether or not Oswald was involved…
  • p. 39 …But Rockefeller Commission sources say that these activities could shed a new light on the never…
  • p. 47 across the avenue and affected the man in the street as never before. People could not…
  • p. 51 …Red Rose," he said curtly. "I've never heard of that one," Wolfe ventured. "Neither has…
  • p. 52 …arrange a service for us." "I've never heard of the K.G.B.'s working…
  • p. 53 …In his entire diplomatic career, Stepanov had never communicated a message to a head of state…
  • p. 54 …The furies that were released with the assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy have never gone away…
  • p. 55 …private investigators to challenge its findings. "I never believed that he Oswald did it without any…
  • p. 60 …Although Shaw's participation in an assassination conspiracy has never been proven to anyone's satisfaction…
  • p. 62 …One possible explanation for these differences is that there never was a real Lee Harvey Oswald…
  • p. 65 …Director Allen Dulles said it probably could never be determined independently, whether Oswald was a CIA…
  • p. 68 …or domestically or even if they were never sus- cessful carried out. YESTERDAYS leading witness at…
  • p. 69 …assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, he never had any information indicating potential violence on the…
  • p. 71 …It seems that Bullet 300 never presented its ideal base in a hard surface in the…
  • p. 72 …instantly whenever cornered." Oh, no, Oswald was never just some 'crackpot' wandering around the Soviet Union…
  • p. 74 …According to a memorandum by Helms, the CIA never received the Navy's pictures of Oswald…
  • p. 75 …The lawyer told Epstein that they never called him back and the Warren Report contains no…
  • p. 79 …K know," he said. "the CIA was never responsible for the assassination of any foreign leader…
The mystery of the mortal wound: Kennedy, still clutching at his throat wound, is hit with explosive force from behind . . .

# Dallas: New Questions and Answers

They are a breed apart—an odd-lot assortment of skeptics and ideologues, rationalists and fantasts who have never believed that Lee Harvey Oswald alone killed John F. Kennedy and have invested up to a dozen years of their lives in trying to disprove it. They flowered first in the middle '60s, then fell into discouraged retreat with the collapse of former New Orleans D.A. Jim Garrison's jerry-built attempt to prove their case in court. But the true disbelievers are back now, more numerous and insistent than ever, with their three-Oswald and four-assassin scenarios and their dizzying exegeses of every scrap of paper and every frame of film on the JFK shelves in the National Archives. And this time, in a nation still traumatized by the crimes and lies of Watergate, they have found their widest audience yet for their demand that the inquest be reopened.

Their doubts, reasonable or not, have inspired at least two dozen nonfiction books, four novels, three feature films, several national conferences and a recent freshel of articles in journals ranging from Penthouse to Rolling Stone. A bootleg copy of the famed Zapruder home movie of the assassination-blood, brain fragments and all-has played twice this spring on network TV and numberless times to smaller audiences around the nation. A group of Old New Leftists in Cambridge, Mass., embraced

the cause and booked 250 campus lectures (at $780 each) in a single year. A Warren commission staff alumnus, who still believes that Oswald acted alone, has urged review of the case—and now Texas a U.S. Rep. Henry Gonzalez has formally proposed that Congress undertake the rehearing.

The Warren verdict is indeed threaded through with unanswered questions and unresolved anomalies. What its detractous offer in its place is one or another alternative hypothesis far tidier than the commission's one-man, one-gun analysis. But their sort of tidiness has its own vices. Supposition is elevated into fact; accident becomes criminal design; evidence is accepted on faith if it fits a conspiracy theory and rejected as manufactured if it does not. The doubters, moreover, have never harmonized their own doubts about whether or not Oswald was involved at all, or how many assassins fired how many shots, or who might have put them up to it—the CIA, or the Mafia, or the Communists, or Texas oil, or some other party or parties unknown.

Still, amid the mélange of fact and guess, reason and imagination, there are provocative questions:

## DIO OSWALD DO IT?

The Voice Test: "I didn't shoot anybody, no sir," Oswald told an interviewer at Dallas police headquarters, and many

doubters have always chosen to believe him. Now they have been joined by a sometime CIA computer analyst, George O'Toole, who played a tape of Oswald's denial to a Psychological Stress Evaluator—a device that supposedly measures and charts tension in a person's voice—and found none of the bunched-up, hedge-shaped clusters of squiggles that commonly accompany lying. In Penthouse and in a newly published book, "The Assassination Tapes," O'Toole rendered his unambiguous judgment: "Quite clearly, Lee Harvey Oswald was telling the truth."

The Flaws: The PSE, while gradually gaining acceptance, remains controversial among experts in lie-detection; neither the FBI nor the CIA uses it, and Dr. Joseph Kubis, a Fordham psychologist who tested it extensively for the Army, came away doubting its validity. There remains, moreover, the powerful circumstantial case that Oswald was involved, alone or not. The only known murder weapon, a 1940 Mannlicher-Carcano rifle, was traced to him and bore his palmprint; the only recovered cartridges and bullet fragments were traced to the rifle; the revolver that killed Dallas police patrolman J.D. Tippit was in Oswald's possession when he was arrested in a movie theater 80 minutes after the assassination. Even some conspiracy theorists concede the case, and David

Oswald's voice chart: Did the absence of stress signs amid the squiggles prove his innocence of murdering JFK?

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 83 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.