Documents / FOIA release
This CIA-held copy of a 13 July 1968 magazine article, "A Reporter at Large," was written by the author of the book "Inquest." It examines New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison's investigation into the Kennedy assassination and his arrest of Clay Shaw. The author concludes that Garrison mishandled evidence and decoded address book numbers without sound basis. It also says the only evidence the author saw connecting Shaw to the assassination was fraudulent. Flying saucers come up only in passing.
~ a - , 0 the right judges, but the conviction was reversed by the U.$. Supreme Court, in a decision that held that individualt have the right to criticire public oili- . rials even tlioogh the charges may turn mtt to be unfounded. (iarrison is popu- larly referred to in New ()__rh-ans as the jolly Green Giant--an image eon- _jured up by his imposing physical stature (sir: feet six inches) and his .political glad hand. \\'ht-n l met him, in__r_1t_iyl1\p_r_il_, his welcorne Was gra- Citrus, if ‘slightly fulsomc; he told me, almost solemnly, that it was his reading Jmy book that first set him thinlting about launching anrinvestigr _ tioit of-his own. (Later. l learned that this was a standard greeting, ex- _ tended to almost all critics or the 1 ll/arrcn Comniixsioo.) Over a leisure- ‘ ly dinner at llmussar_d's, Garrison be- , gan to tcll me about the conspiracy hei had uncovered. lt was .1 diffuse nar- rative, in which it appeared that Os- waldbad only beeitifeig-ning the role lie went tn considerable lengths to es- ' tablish for himself as a pro-Castroitc antl had in fact been part of an anti‘- Castro assassination tearn trained by David Ferric. Ferrie, in turn, was in some important way-——Ga'rrison never explained exactly how_-personally in- volved with Clay Shaw. \Vhen a plan shoot Castro was aborted becauseI to E i Oswald could not obtain it visa to Cuba, the asmssinatitin team turned its atten- mission. . ~ ' conspimcy? “It's exactly like a chess problem," he explaincd."'The \Var- ten Commission moved the same pieces back and forth and got nowhere. l made a new move and solvtid the iprohlcm." The movehe meant was the iarrest of Clay Shaw. He pointed out that after Shaw wasarresterl men from the District Attorney's otlice searched Shaw’: home, in-the French Quarter, _and found in it zt cache of new evi- E dencc, which he suggested that l should see, becattsc it would give me "it new perspective on the case." _ Early the‘ next morning, l_ wettt to the District /\ttorney's oflice, which is housed, next to the Parish Prison, in ‘ ‘ the Criminal District Court Building, " a massive structure at Tulane Avenue 5 and South Broad. Garrison had not yet arrived, but one of his assistants, James C. Aleock, told me that- Garrison had ; left word that l should “start going 1 through the evidence." I did so with - joncs Harris, .1 'Nc.w Yorker of inde- pendent means whohas devoted the better part of the last three years to a private investigation of the assa_sina- tiorl. -t t .3- SK cardboard c.tt"tou.x were ‘brought out containing t\etsti|\;tl be- ‘I fl mgitigs of Clay Shaw: letters, photo- raplu, financial rccordt, hlucprittt.\ for renovating houses in the French Quarter, the tn.1rtttscript_e of pl:t_\'_s he h ad written years ago, calemlars, _checltbooltn, atldrt-as boolts. ln one box were a hlaclt cmtume, a ttct mask, and MIIIIQ S l sud had plastic .\lippers—all of which had claimed were part of his hlardi Gran costume. Alcoclt that the District -'\ttor'nc_v's statt yet to examine all this material, haw! 96$ and he soggestetl that llarris and l look through Shaw's addres boolts and V financial records in hopes of discover- _- ing some information that might inter- est Garrison. \Ve were lcit alone with y t l 4 hatl I SI he evidence. fhough none of these materials, as . far as l could sec after e.\att\ining them,G aiiything directly to do with the sxtssination, the odd way in which Garrison treated them did give tne, when l thought about it later, “.1 new perspective on the case.” l recallctl that a judge's order had forbidden discus- sion or disclosure of any evidence in the case. The very fact that llarris and I were allowed to examine objct't.\ seized from Shaw's home and desig- nated "evidence" scctnetl to be a direct . violation of that order. \\'hy, l wort- dererl, should the District Attorney risk having his case thrown out of ill ~ llowi had Garrison discovered this th ; I tion to President Kennedy, and, on} court on a technicality by letting November Z2, I963, carried out its outsidi.-rs go freely" through the evi- <-nce? Moreover, it scented curious :tt Clay Shaw's papers had not al- t-ady beenirigorously set-utini/.etl by Garrison or his .stafl', especially .~utce =_Garrison had told several people, in- ‘ c hiding rue, that one of the main rt'a- sons for arresting Clay Shaw on i\l;o'ch lst was to prevent hint frotn tlc_\lttl_\‘- .ing his personal papers. Six weclts had P :1 assed», and yet from what l ,sa\v tt ppeared that no real investigation of ,Clay Shaw was going on at :tll but C I [only a search for peripheral cl|:tr:tctt'rs onnected with David l*err"e. lf Gar- ‘ rison believed that $ha\v had-openly conspired to kill the President, why was the inquiry- into his activities beittgtreated with such ap- parent nonchalance? A discovery thatijoncs Harris made while we were going through the papers provided considerable in- sight into the nature of Garrison‘: investigation. \Vhat_ Harrb found was a five-digit number that was common to both Shaw's : and Oswald's ‘address booltsi The entry in $lt.-t\v's M ‘lmolt was "Lee ()tluttt, l'() llox l9l(l(r, l);tll.n, 'l.e.\." ln ().\walrl'_\ book, the number l9lfI6 was pre- ceded by tltc Cyrillic l-rim‘ ll ;t (which, mt- other Rttssinn letters on the page, the \\'arrcn Com- mistion had zmunted were made during ()swa'|d's two- and~a-half-year stay in the soviet Union), Tlimiglt the coinci- dence of numbers proved nothing in it- self. it was striking, and (.i.trriso|t decided that further investigatiott was merited. Shortly thereafter, Garrison announced to the press that he had found the cntrr "l'() l9lll6" in both ()swalrl's and Slt.t\v's .'ttltlt't‘:~$ books, and that the num- her was a “tttittt'.\i$tt‘tlt or fictional mnnht-r," which removed “the possibility of coinci- dence." Moreover, Garrison mid that “l'() l9lfl6" was a code that, when deci- phert-tl, produced jack R|th_i,"s unlisted tele- phone number, \\"ll l-$60!, ano “no oth- - er tuiniher on earth." The method by which Garrison “deci- phered" the.eodc is worth following. Starting with the "scrambled" number l9lfl6, Garrison “unscr.-tmliled" it (by choosing the nearest digit, then the farthest, thed tltenext nearest, etc.) to produce the number l6')Ol. Ruby's number was l560l, so by unscram- bling thedigits Garrison managed to match the last two digits in the two numbers. The next step was to subtract Llllll from l69(l-l, and—prestr+-— l56(ll. Finally, Garrison (onvcrtctl rli¢ Pl’K‘fi-Y .“l'0" to “\\'ll" by .1 systetu that, according to the proniinent cryp- tographer lrwin Mann, yieltlsat lmst six different prefixes; Garrison cltosc Ruby's. _ ' A few days after Carrison_,1n- nnunced that he had deciphcred the code, it became known that the num- ber l9lO6 in S_h:iw’s address book was by no means “nonexistent or fiction-Tl." PO Box l9lO6 had been, as Shaw's addres book indicated, the address in Dallas of a man named Lee Odom, Qdom stated that he had been intro- duced to Shaw in_ I966 by the nttnagrer
Not linked to a story yet.
FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 19 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.