Documents / FOIA release
This CIA-held copy of a 13 July 1968 magazine article, "A Reporter at Large," was written by the author of the book "Inquest." It examines New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison's investigation into the Kennedy assassination and his arrest of Clay Shaw. The author concludes that Garrison mishandled evidence and decoded address book numbers without sound basis. It also says the only evidence the author saw connecting Shaw to the assassination was fraudulent. Flying saucers come up only in passing.
“Cooper”1 page
arrest of $l\erid.tn and alci Ricliaul '|‘o\\"nlt-\_ woo had assisted in the |irep.tr.tti<~|t of the slmw, clutrgittg them with attetnpted lirihery. Spe- - cilically, G.trrison_ alleged that they had otleretl Perry Russo .1 free trip to C.tlifiit"tti.\. llut if this oticr teelinieallr eonstitutetl an act nt hrihery, Garrison himself liatl talten cot|sitler;thle pains In hail the trap. lle told me himself that he had directed Russo to speak In the reporters over _ a ntonitoretl phone and inquire what protection they could ntft-r him if he were to change-his testi- mony. The purpose was, as he put it, “tn give t\'.ll.C. enottglt rope tn hang itself." ln his public statement on the _ matter, Garrison chargetl that the l\'.li.C. program “will probably stand for many years to come as a symbol of the length to which some powerful nut- side interests are willing to go in order to interfere with state governtni:nt." The eases ‘are still pending. Shortly after Garrison's skirmish with i\'.ll.C., \\'illiant Gurvich rc- .\iglll'&l as om: nf his ittvestigiitors, alter telling Senator Robert l". Ken- neily that there was no lvasis in fact and no material evitlence in Garri- son's C:\$e,. Qur\*i€lt's pri\'.'tte—tletective age-|lc_t' had conductetl most of thc lie- detector testsithat Garrison had or- jtlt-red, and at the time of his resignation ‘tirvicli had in his possession a master “ C: m _Iile nf the principal evidence in the case. This defection not only made for em- h.'ll'|'Zl?l‘lll I headlines hut II N;|\t'\l ti i the _ __ B _ ‘ _ ' l l possibility that (iarnson s fund of c_on- fitlctttial ittformation--or "his laelt ofl ‘ such a fund-——woultl he made public. ln a statement to the press, Garrison described Uur\'icli's resignation as "the latest lnnve from the Eastern head- quarters of the Estaltlislllllcttt to at- ~tempt tn discredit our investig:ttion.” lt was all part of a coiirilinateil plot _ against him. ln another press release, he said, “All they are doing is 'pro\'ing two things: first, that we were correct when we ttncovered the im'ol\'ement uf the Central lntelligence Agency in the asstssin.-ttion;-second, that there is sonietliing very wrong today with our goveritritent in \Va_shingt<in, l).C., in- asmuch as it is willing tn use massive cciinotttic power tn conceal the truth from the people." Later, in his Plat-boy intcr\'iew, Garrison iinplietl that Gur- viclt had been a C.l..'\. infiltrator from the start. He also charged.Gurvich with ‘petty 'larcen_v, claiming theifilc that he had was worth nineteen dollars. .-\nd, for good measure, he charged on the .-\.B.C. “Page One" television show that Senator Robert Kennedy "has made a real efiort to stop the in- vestigation." - i l °~ . .<\ftrr it had hecomc quite ele.=t"th.ii \\'.\s arrestr-l in (‘hi--_ .\ftt"r -v~r.e ini- “ ‘ . ‘ - 2-oi rclut'tA:\t‘e, Ljt-\t’tt\.~r lament-ontmt of (iartisvns cast t\~t.:t med to generate .1 spectre of eon -t-|.1\\ (_;\I'Il\\|I tool: the l--sit--ti |-it-\; l he _ y _ Rio-tlcs, ot (lhio, finally .i;|'enl to ex- trrtdzte .\\i\'el to Loiaisianz if (;.\T‘l';\l|"t3. ~_-, . . . . step avttl started creatintl l\<eutlt»_,m;<tq vmitlil complete tl‘-e papers with=a sisty on himself. \\'l\en reporters in Tokyo ‘J-\\§_ Garrison, ho\\-ever, did not talte \ 1‘ the steps that were necessary. .-\s the -\.~lt\‘tl Chief lusticc liarl \ '.trrett 15_ _ .- ‘ ‘ l . _ _ o union of the Garnson tYl\‘\"_<2i<'_\li\\t\, his-lsvliine .tppr-uchrd. .-\s.s~.<tant Dstrietl .- he replied, "l want to sltirt (hrs ten’ l.'\tt\-rney .-\le-\"X asked if he should re- lti rtt the [Wis tn Ohio ,1;-|.,| (];"iq,"carefully, hec.-tuse the case could some-, l ‘ I‘-' _ , \\ l ' d_it' come ht-fore the Sopiettte Court. Mil hlln I1"! to hither. .-\nd ret in the Pressed as to \\'hi:ther Garrison pos- r".-‘at-5n_\~ interview Garrison irtisted, sessed any evidence that rniglit contra- diet the findings of the Comntissitin he had headed. the Chief Justice an- sweretl, "l't"c heard that he claims to have such information, hut l haven t "The reason we were unable to nhuin .\'o\‘el's extmdition from Ohio . . . is that there are powerful fr rces in \\'ashington who find it imperative tn ' conceal from the .-\me|ic.tn public the seen any." Gartisott innneeliatel_r eh~\r- l truth about the ;t§1\<in.'\Kit\fl.“ He went acterized this “new emntteratt.tclt" as; on to iittlieate that Novel w.ts_now .1 "he.t\"\' artillery whistling in from ntatcrial witness in his ease and, ac- ‘ “ eorilingi to attorneys for Novel, implied '1 'l'ok)"o," and said in a press rtlease, lt is a little disconcerting to find the Chief justice of the United States on his hands and knees trying to tie some sticks of dynamite to the ease. How- ever, the Chief justice is a practical min at-id l expect he knows wlut he is that his former "investigator was sunehnw connected with the eon- ’.s;~ir;tc_\‘. (t\'o\-el is suing Garrison and P.'.:_rfto_t' for ten million dollars in punitive and compensatory tlatnages) .-\nd in a speech to the Radio and (ltllflg. ‘. ._ . 'l‘llC_vl;l5( lilltk‘ lit W;l_$ CI\llk‘\l_ 1-(‘lC\'i§l(\fl ,\'g\\'-5 ,-\_\s<v(i_\tinn of into action to perform -1 $<‘r\‘h‘v \\'-\$ Southern California, in Los .-\ng\-les, when the llresident of the United hcett connected with thi. Ltntral ln Garrison cited hrs failure to 0l\t.un lSt.1tt‘$ was assassinated hy men who had ,\'t\\'t-I've t-_et;_1tliti.\n as evidence that' . ‘. _ tr- ‘ . ' tiestdent Johnson was putting pres- 'lelligence' .*\gr"ttc_\'.”'(.i:trrison predicted sure on local otlicials to secrete wit- t a new hrtiatlsitlc from-the federal au _ 4 0 I thonties: “_ludgtng from the careful nes\es from l\l|I\_ Hi went on to at etise President lohnson of preventingi l “the people in this country from seeing co?-rtlittzitton which the hstahtislttttettt ease, it is safe zo expect that other ele- ments of the federal government and ~T_;i,..wt~.| in its last ofll-nsit-e against the the evidence," and asserted, with the logie of mi I~onn. “. . . the fact that he has profited from the ass\s<in:tt~Zoq ttalinnill nress will now follow up Will‘; most, more than any other man, makest a new effort tn tliscredit the case and l the prosecution." i Another example of Garrison's ti:ch- that he is not involved . . ." I I I J nique involvetl Gordon t\'nvel, the electronics expert, who had told him ahout l-'errie's participation in a "pick advising Garrison on anti-ea\'e$drop- ping techniques, the business that had first hruttgltt him tit Garri- son's attention, to become a witness against l"errie and. at l . . . . least in (_varnson's mind, an "investigator." Then, ac- cording tonne account, Gar- _ f'i$<tn was told that his inves- tigator had been furnishing information to t\'.B.C. re- porters, and Novel was Suh- poettacd to appear l\_t.-fore a . granel jury. lnstead of ap- pearing. Novel left the state and went to Ohio. Garrison filed hur- glary charges against i\'ovel, alleging that he had participated in the conspir- acy to steal arms from the $Chlumt\'r- ger _\\’ell company in-Houma, and he -13.. ' it imperative that he sec that the evi- dence is released. so that we can know t-\nitt$0N's technique in espounding the so-talletl second conspiracy is nip" of munitions from the Schlflllv typical of what Richard l*lofst:\-.lter has herger \\'i.-ll company, in Houma. Li“!-E classified as “the paranoid style in Lsiana. t\'ttvel rapidly -‘atlvanced irom_ ,-\m¢riq_m pofltiee-" to which "the (K1- ing of persecution is centr::l." and which is “systematized in gramliose theories of conspir- . ac_\'." $till, the fact that Gar- rison expresses his id-ras in .1 paranoid st_\"le does not oi it- self rtile ou: the possihilit_\' ' that there is substance to he claims ls the C_l..-\.. for <.\_ ample, really concealing some in\'ol\-ement of its :t;ents in the asmssination, as Garrison has claimed? ln .\la\. Wan’, Garrison declared on the .-\.B.C. “ls- sues and .-\nswet‘s“ television program, “Oi course the Central lno:iligen\\' Agency had no role in the planning or -intending the assasination_ of President Kennedy. I think that would be at ridiculous position for anyone tn take.” »
Not linked to a story yet.
FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 19 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.