Documents / FOIA release
This Central Intelligence Agency conference report, numbered RTT 95-10039 and dated October 1995, presents the proceedings of a conference held 30 September to 1 October 1993. The CIA's Geographic Resources Division sponsored the conference. In it, academic geographers, anthropologists and US Government officials examined ethnic conflict by region, covering Eastern Europe, the former Soviet Union, Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, Asia and South Asia. The report also discusses what these conflicts mean for US policy. It does not deal with UFOs or unidentified aerial phenomena.
“Anderson”6 pages
' 'lAppr0ved for Release: 2018/06/01 C00123268 Growing Indian Militancy One response by South American Indians to threats of territorial invasion has been to organize into political action groups. Indians have been aided in this efiort by Roman Catholic missionaries, anthropologists, environmental organizations, and others. Noteworthy among these groups is the Federation of Shuar Cen- ters ( Federacion de Centros.Shuar) in Ecuador; which was organized in 1964 at a time when development was first penetrating the locizl Indians’ territory. This group provides a model that: has been followed by many other Amazon Indian groups within Ecuador and elsewhere. The Shuar Federation has allied with other Indian organizations representing both lowland and highland groups, and it also works with labor unions, peasant farmer leagues, and other non-Indian groups to advance common interests. The objectives of newly emerging Indian militancy have begun to extend beyond land, mineral, and biotic resource-related issues to broader policy areas. In Ecuador the Indian political action organizations are working hard to change the govemment policy of national integration aimed at eliminating ethnic dif- ferences and creating a unified mestizo national cul- ture. The policy, grounded the assumption that eventually all Indian peoples will be brought into the mestizo-based national culture and that ethnic minori- ties will cease to exist, is implemented through Spanish-language education, indoctrinating Indians in national history, and similar programs. The Indian organizations—which support the idea of a plurina- tional or multinational state that would accommodate the various Indian ethnic groups, Afro-Ecuadorians from the Pacific Coast, and the dominant mestizo national culture—-are working toward a plurinational state that would grant a degree of political and cul- tural autonomy to Indian groups. Similar agendas exist in other Andean countries. For example, Peru recognizes Quechua as an oflicial language, and Indi- ans in Bolivia are increasing their influence on national government policy. In Ecuador and other Andean countries, Indian inter- ests clash with a number of national goals, both stated and implicit. Thus far; diflerences over these conflict- ing interests have generally been headed ofl’ by the national govemments or resolved peacefully through the political process. However; as the Indian groups become more militant, they will demand to have an increasingly more active role in setting national policy with respect to land, resource use, and cultural preser- vation. The militancy of Indian organizations clearly sets the stage for potential conflict with the non-Indian groups who perceive that their interests may be under- mined by granting greater autonomy to Indians. Mexico’s Indian Populations Mexico has a history of ethnic conflict that began in the pre-Columbian past and continues to the present. Indians have been involved in the great revolutions of Mexican history. They were_ recruited by Padre Hidalgo at the beginning of the revolution against Spain in 1811 and followed Emiliano Zapata during the Revolution of 1910-17. Indian rebellions include the Caste Wars of the 19th century in Yucatan and the Cristero rebellion of 1926 in Michoacan, Jalisco, and Colima. The land reforms that followed the Revolu- tion of 1910, along with close control by the ruling political party, the Institutional Revolutionary Party 1 (PR1), have limited Indian protests during the latter half of the century. However, conflicts continue to occur on a local level, and some have involved the national government. Most of these conflicts are in the southern part of the country or the Yucatan Peninsula, where most of the traditional Indian communities are located. As in South America, ethnic conflicts in Mexico have their roots in disputes over land, mineral resources, and cultural preservation policy. Despite the claim of the PR1 to be a defender of the interests of the people, Indian concerns consistently take a back seat to 89 Approved for Release: 2018/06/01 C00123268
Not linked to a story yet.
FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 205 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.