Documents / FOIA release

(Estimated Pub Date) the Challenge of Ethnic Conflict to National and International Order in the 1990S: Geographic Perspectives- October 1995

Central Intelligence Agency · 1995-10-01 · 205 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Central Intelligence Agency conference report, numbered RTT 95-10039 and dated October 1995, presents the proceedings of a conference held 30 September to 1 October 1993. The CIA's Geographic Resources Division sponsored the conference. In it, academic geographers, anthropologists and US Government officials examined ethnic conflict by region, covering Eastern Europe, the former Soviet Union, Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, Asia and South Asia. The report also discusses what these conflicts mean for US policy. It does not deal with UFOs or unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 50 …For example, Muslim Serbs and Muslim Croats never defined them- selves as a people. They never…
  • p. 51 …I think that’s very crucial to under- standing why the Albanians never claimed Kosovo. Of…
  • p. 62 …be taught as a second foreign language, never as the first, and d_) less information and…
  • p. 78 …It never was. It might be useful, instead, to view the Soviet Union as a colonial…
  • p. 91 …As such, the ability of states to get from their people what they want has never…
  • p. 92 …The peoples of Africa never chose what their bound- aries should be—they were imposed by…
  • p. 93 …I never would have sent them in the first place. I thought our job was to…
  • p. 109 …Most of the provisions of this agreement were never imple- mented, and Kurdish autononiy became a…
  • p. 110 …those remaining in Lebanon, that prospect was never accepted by Muslims. The absence of believable data…
  • p. 112 …the vast majority of them—who have never known democracy. Other hopes can be enter- tained…
  • p. 114 …But in this region we can never say never, as evi- denced by the recent gasp…
  • p. 116 …Although Sovietologists could never have predicted the rapid events that dismantled the USSR at the beginning…
  • p. 119 …The Chinese, in my opinion,‘ never take China for granted, culturally, politically, or otherwise. This is…
  • p. 120 …What is going on here? National identities, although imagined, are never arbi- trary but arise in…
  • p. 121 …be one reason why these categories have never been challenged. The very Confucian practice of the…
  • p. 123 …These ethnic identities are “imagined” in Ben Ander- son’s (1983) terms, but they are never…
  • p. 133 …Inter- vention in the cause of the exacerbation of ethnic conflict should never be justified. Intervention…
  • p. 141 …Sociocultural identities in South Asia have never been fixed. The corporate mobility of particular groups, some…
  • p. 147 …Although never posing a serious challenge to Congress, the Mahasabha was particularly influential in the period…
  • p. 157 …were always moderate and that the extremists never represented the Sikh rank and file. One fundamental…
  • p. 166 …These are the people who have never had any form of internationally recognized status and who…
  • p. 169 …ways to enter as illegal immigrants and never get counted. 1 I Another important point to…
  • p. 177 …The -French nation never managed to incorpo- rate the adjacent French-speaking Belgian Walloons or the…
  • p. 186 …The reason Armenians still hate Turks is that there has never been reconciliation. Similarly there will…
  • p. 204 …You are never going to have total agreement on mov- ing boundaries. In fact, hundreds of…
Approved for Release: 2018/06/01 C00123268 ’
Ethnic Conflict Within Western Europe
Colin H. Williams
Research Professor,
Department of Welsh
University of Wales
College of Cardiff;
Honorary Professor,
Center for Ethnic and Geolinguistic Research
Division of Geography,
Staffordshire University
Introduction
Ethnic conflicts that challenge the existing order are a
recurrent feature of the European political landscape.
A critical feature of European history, which has pro-
duced successive periods of ethnic conflict, has been
the relative lack of congruence among population, set-
tlement patterns, and the political organization of
space and territory. Sovereignty over European terri-
tory was initially determined by church and dynastic
settlements following periodic warfare and population
transfer. Indigenous majorities usually, albeit not nec-
essarily, fonned the constituent population of essen-
tially multiethnic states and often discriminated
against nonnationals.
Central to the process of legitimizing some cultures
and alienating others has been the rise of the “territo-
rial nation-state.” Most histories of state fonnation
and nation building have involved the institutional
denial of minority rights—initially justified on reli-
gious grounds and more recently reflecting the exigen-
cies of state nationalism. During the period of
chauvinistic nationalism and state expansion-
roughly 1789 to 1919—the destmction ofethnic
minority cultures was deemed a necessary concomi-
tant of modemity and progress. As the uneven effects
of capitalism penetrated into the marginal, ethnically
differentiated peripheries of Europe, outmoded cul-
tures were considered to be anathema to the realiza-
tion of a fully integrated national market. “Nation
states” often sought to socialize their citizenry through
a number of pivotal agencies—-principally the educa-
tion system, conscription into the anned forces, and
legislation. These new state-controlled domains struc-
tured the range of identities that were to be recognized
and sanctioned in the public realm. As a consequence,
many of the current conflicts based in part upon ethnic
considerations are the result of this historical lack of
congruence among self-determination, economic
development, and political representation.
I will address several types of ethnic issues facing
contemporary Westem Europe, highlight the most
pressing, and draw implications for multiethnic
accommodation and adjustment to a changing global
order. My concern throughout will be to emphasize a
spatial perspective at urban, regional, and continental
scales.
Ethnic Tensions Along a Frontier Divide: Northern
Ireland
The Northern Ireland prob1em—misguidedly labeled
a religious conflict—is a classic illustration of the jux-
taposition of two ethnic groups, a common feature of
European borderlands. It is also the most persistent,
intractable ethnic conflict at present within the Euro-
pean Community. As a result of the English coloniza-
tion of Ireland, a process that was contemporary with
the English colonization of North America (see
R. Sack, 1986, pp. 138-140), a major “shatter belt”
was created in Ulster. This belt divided Catholic from
Protestant, Celt from Anglo-Saxon, the gavelkind
from the primogeniture inheritance system, and an
agrarian economy from an industrial one (see T. Jor-
dan, 1988, pp. 89-146, 393-407).
A cultural border is evident in Belfast; the neighbor-
hood divide equates to a national, if not an interna-
tional, divide. The divide is a permanent focus of
stress and violence because it is not only a place-
specific frontier zone but also the cultural interface
between two opposing systems. In an excellent over-
view of the political geography of Belfast‘s main
troublespot, the Shankill-Falls divide, Boal and Liv-
ingstone (1983, pp. 138-58) examine the context in
which the conflict takes place.
42
Approved for Release: 2018/06/01 C00123268

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 205 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.