Documents / FOIA release
This Central Intelligence Agency conference report, numbered RTT 95-10039 and dated October 1995, presents the proceedings of a conference held 30 September to 1 October 1993. The CIA's Geographic Resources Division sponsored the conference. In it, academic geographers, anthropologists and US Government officials examined ethnic conflict by region, covering Eastern Europe, the former Soviet Union, Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, Asia and South Asia. The report also discusses what these conflicts mean for US policy. It does not deal with UFOs or unidentified aerial phenomena.
“Terry”13 pages
Approved for Release: 2018/06/01 C00123268 During the second Balkan War (1912-13) the Greeks and Serbs, with the help of the Romanians, invaded Bulgaria and took land fromj it. Romania seized Dobrudja (Dobrogea) while the Serbs and Greeks divided Macedonia between them. Not only did they take the land, but also they instituted policies aimed at eradicating the Bulgarian presence and claim. Serbia renamed northern Macedonia South Serbia and out- lawed both the Bulgarian language and church (those used by the Macedonians themselves) and replaced them with the Serbian language and church. It was hoped that the Macedoniansof South Serbia would become Serbs. Greece was far worse in its treatment of Macedonians. Slavic Macedonians (and Bulgarians in Thrace) were forced to accept Greek names and call themselves Greeks or flee the country. A policy of Hellenization was instituted throughout the region. Between the second Balkan War and World War II, policies of Serbianization, Hellenization, and ethnic cleansing were openly practiced in both Macedonia and Thrace. The region was _a1so ethnically cleansed of Macedonians and Bulgarians, as was Greek Thrace, which had a Slavic majority. In addition to this, hun- dreds of thousands of Greeks from the Pontic region of Turkey were resettled into those parts of Macedonia under Greek control. _ The Greek objection to the recognition of a Republic of Macedonia derives from more than issues related to an ancient conqueror. Greece fears the demand for the return of the homeland by a free Macedonia and repa- rations for past atrocities. Greece also fears that the ethnic Macedonians will demand their homes back.° This is potentially one of the most serious issues in Eastern Europe, as it can involve Greece, Bulgaria, Serbia, Macedonia, and even Albania in a real war. More is said on this later. The Serbs and Kosovo A similar situation exists in Kosovo, a land claimed by both ethnic Albanians and Serbs. Geographical evi- dence (such as place names) clearly indicates a contin- uous settlement of the region by ethnic Albanians. The Serbian claim is based on a war that took place in the 6 Macedonians from Greek (Aegean) Macedonia fled to the Ser- bian-controlled areas of Macedonia as well as to Bulgaria, Austra- lia, Canada, and the United States after 1913. early 13th century. According to legend, the Serbs were defeated at the battle of Kosovo and later fled north into what is today Greater Serbia.’ Historically, however, the Serbs came from the north and were con- centrated along the Morava valley in what is today the heartland of the Serbs.‘ It is important to note that it was church policy to have geographical diocese within which an official language was used. There is no question that Kosovo was within the territorial domain of the Serbian Orthodox Church, but that does not mean that the population living there was Serbian. The Battle of Kosovo, the role of Krali Marko, or other folktales should not be accepted as a justification for Serbian aggression against ethnic Albanians who compose about 90 percent of that region today. A propaganda campaign against ethnic Albanians was part and parcel of Serbian policy long before the cur- rent crises in Krajina and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Serbian propoganda claimed that the Patriarsija Con- vent in Pec was bumed to the ground by Albanians and that the Serbian nuns there had been raped. I was there one year after the alleged fire and rape, and the Serbian nuns in the convent knew nothing about such an event. The convent was still standing, and there was no damage to it whatsoever. Claims were also made that Albanians killed, raped, and tortured Serbs in the region, yet the local Serbs in Kosovo declared to me that that was a rare occurrence. Many Serbs of Prizren, Pee, Orahovac, and Dj akovica (in the western part of Kosovo), on the other hand, told me that pov- erty forced Serbs to sell their homes and move to Ser- bia proper. Some laughed at the fact that many Serbs who sold their homes to ethnic Albanians in Kosovo 7 Part of the claim is also that Prince Marko (Krali Marko) was a Serb and that he was killed at this battle. According to their own sources, he came from Prilep (in Macedonia). As such, he is claimed by Macedonians as a Macedonian and by Bulgarians as a Bulgar. 1-le may also have been a Vlah, a people renowned for their military abilities at the time. One need recognize that Albanians also have epic songs about this battle in which three Albanian princes were killed, not only a Serbian one. We should not be dis- cussing the right to rule Kosovo, as argued by Serbs and Albanians, based on 13th century battles or folk songs, or we will have a Bul- garian-Macedonian-Serbian war as well as a Serbian-Albanian one. 8 This is most likely the Kingdom of Morava (Moravia) referred to in the ancient texts regarding the brothers Kiril (Cyril) and Metod (Methodius), not Moravia in the Czech Republic. 31 Approved for Release: 2018/06/01 C00123268
Not linked to a story yet.
FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 205 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.