Documents / FOIA release

(Estimated Pub Date) the Challenge of Ethnic Conflict to National and International Order in the 1990S: Geographic Perspectives- October 1995

Central Intelligence Agency · 1995-10-01 · 205 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Central Intelligence Agency conference report, numbered RTT 95-10039 and dated October 1995, presents the proceedings of a conference held 30 September to 1 October 1993. The CIA's Geographic Resources Division sponsored the conference. In it, academic geographers, anthropologists and US Government officials examined ethnic conflict by region, covering Eastern Europe, the former Soviet Union, Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, Asia and South Asia. The report also discusses what these conflicts mean for US policy. It does not deal with UFOs or unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 9 …He also dis- cusses how various groups have reacted to rising terri- torial nationalism. Approved for…
  • p. 18 …The issue of sense of territory is thus closely linked to the second core terri- torial…
  • p. 19 …The latter encompasses laws that set aside some terri- tory for a given ethnic group. The…
  • p. 28 …The link between territory, identity, and terri- toriality becomes especially dynamic when discord exists between two…
  • p. 32 …Murphy made about ethnic mobili- zation and socioeconomic status as they relate to terri- toriality. Dr…
  • p. 33 …suggest giving the old provinces more political-terri- torial significance within the state. Then their citizens…
  • p. 50 …The Serbs want Krajina as a piece of geographical terri- tory, and the Serbs who live…
  • p. 52 …Sovereignty over European terri- tory was initially determined by church and dynastic settlements following periodic warfare…
  • p. 66 …That may mean some of the kinds of terri- torial policies that I suggested. It also…
  • p. 76 …National identity and terri- torial identity have been intimately interrelated, and a rising sense of national…
  • p. 79 …The big- gest threat to Russia today in terms of its intemal terri- torial integrity is…
  • p. 153 …The real crux of the terri- torial problem is one of scale because the homoge- neity…
  • p. 184 …Nevertheless, many geographers will agree that one of the most important characteristics of‘terri- tory is…
Approved for Release: 2018/06/01 C00123268
Ethnic and Territorial Conflicts in Eastern Europe
Ronald Wixman
Professor of Geography
University of Oregon
Introduction
Today’s Eastern Europe consists of Estonia, Latvia,
Lithuania, Poland, the Czech and Slovak Republics,
Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Slovenia, Croatia, Bos-
nia and Herzegovina, Macedonia, Yugoslavia (con-
sisting today of Serbia and Montenegro), Albania,
Greece, and European (or Thracian) Turkey. One can
also add to this list Moldova (Bessarabia) and the
western part of Ukraine, as they are culturally, histori-
cally, and geographically tied to the rest of this greater
region. At this point in time, on the other hand, East-
ern Germany and Austria should not be considered
part of the East European realm. The reasons for
including Greece and Thracian Turkey in Eastern
Europe are both historical and cultural and represent a
reality important to the current geopolitical situation
in the Balkans. These last two regions have always
been part of the East European culture realm, but for
purely political and military reasons related to the
Cold War period they were classified differently.
Throughout Eastern Europe, there are serious issues of
nationalism that threaten the stability of individual
countries as well as the region as a whole. Most seri-
ous of these are conflicts stemming from ethnic- and
cultural-territorial-—geographical—demands by one
or more parties. While some of the issues center pri-
marily on ethnic, religious, linguistic, or cultural
rights and privileges, others are manifested in
extremely serious demands for control of given
regions, in open conflict based on ethnic or territorial
claims or in international disputes over the recognition
or nonrecognition of given countries.
Most serious for Europe and the United States, how-
ever, are those that deal with territorial conflict based
on various ethnic claims that demand changes in
national control of these regions and/or population
exchanges or attempts at ethnic cleansing. Indeed,
many of the justifications for current actions are
related to experiences with ethnic cleansing and popu-
lation resettlement policies in the near or distant past.
We must be careful to distinguish between issues that
potentially could lead to serious conflict and those that
are merely local cultural demands. In the latter cate-
gory are issues related to simple demands for ethnic
recognition or the right to one or another cultural insti-
tutions (native language in the media and education,
native language press, or freedom of religion) that do
not threaten to destabilize any given state or nation or
that will probably not result in open hostility between
groups.
Quite serious to a rapidly changing picture of causes
for interethnic conflict in Eastem Europe is the war in
Bosnia and Herzegovina. The current war in Bosnia
may be the precursor to an even greater war that might
involve many other nations, including America’s
NATO Allies Turkey and Greece on opposite sides of
the conflict. In addition, the applied policies by the
Western powers toward this ongoing conflict affect
not only the Balkans as a whole but also other parts of
Eastern Europe and the Middle East. The response, for
example, to Serbian territorial aggression and ethnic
genocide (ethnic cleansing) both sets a precedent for
other countries with problematic minorities and forces
others to assess their own situations relative to foreign
nations with exclave populations.
Before discussing ethnic conflicts in Eastern Europe
today and the impact of Western policy in the “Yugo-
slav War,” a brief discussion is provided on the dis-
tinction between the reasons for and justifications for
territorial claims. This distinction is necessary if one
wishes to obtain an accurate picture of ethnoterritorial
conflict in this diverse region. Claims to territory on
ethnic, national, religious, linguistic, and historical
grounds are common around the world. Sometimes
two groups claim the same territory with differing but
equally understandable reasons for doing so. The J ew-
ishlPalestinian conflict represents such a situation.
Here two peoples are fighting over the same piece of
territory, as it is tied to their current ability to exist as
distinct nations. On the other hand, many conflicts are
tied to far more distant issues in which historical
25
Approved for Release: 2018/06/01 C00123268

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 205 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.