Documents / FOIA release

(Estimated Pub Date) the Challenge of Ethnic Conflict to National and International Order in the 1990S: Geographic Perspectives- October 1995

Central Intelligence Agency · 1995-10-01 · 205 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Central Intelligence Agency conference report, numbered RTT 95-10039 and dated October 1995, presents the proceedings of a conference held 30 September to 1 October 1993. The CIA's Geographic Resources Division sponsored the conference. In it, academic geographers, anthropologists and US Government officials examined ethnic conflict by region, covering Eastern Europe, the former Soviet Union, Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, Asia and South Asia. The report also discusses what these conflicts mean for US policy. It does not deal with UFOs or unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 28 …not a given that some people can cooperate and share territory whereas others must be divided…
  • p. 95 …guilty of mistreating Indians who are not cooperative. It may be that Sendero Luminoso has driven…
  • p. 106 …In the Guate- malan case, it has been a cooperative movement with inputs from the Catholic…
  • p. 130 …2018/06/01 C00123268 ' the loyalty, allegiance, and cooperation of ethnic groups whose interests were perceived…
  • p. 142 …Not surprisingly, the League vacil- lated between periods of cooperation with the Con- gress and periods…
  • p. 192 …Active cooperation in this partnership could lay the foundation for full NATO membership. In short, future…
  • p. 193 …We must now extend these habits of cooperation to the East. 183 I I Approved for…
  • p. 197 …UN or the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe—and as long as certain rules…
  • p. 201 …Learning About Conflict and Cooperation Much of the discussion during the past few days has focused…
Approved for Release: 2018/06/01 C00123268
Concluding Comments: Implications for the
United States and the International Community:
Problems and Prospects
Stanley D. Brunn
Professor of Geography
University of Kentucky
During the past two days we have heard a number of
formal presentations about ethnic conflict and national-
ism in various world regions. These examinations of
ethnic and cultural compositidn and conflict, as well as
the panel discussions, illustrate the ways geographers
look at the world and how they envision contemporary
and future worlds. In summarizing the conference, I
would like to make the following observations:
' We live in two different worlds. First, I would like to
thank those individuals for organizing a conference
devoted specifically to ethnic conflict, nationalism,
and changing world order and for inviting academic
geographers to share with members of the Intelli-
gence Community what they know—and do not
know—about the current political world. I see this
conference as serving many useful purposes, one
being that while “we live in _two different houses,”
we share much in common, especially our interests
in being able to understand what is happening around
the world-—-whether in regard to ethnic conflict,
nationalism, or emerging democracies. It is impor-
tant that the avenues of communication and informa-
tion sharing between those the university and
govemment intelligence communities remain open.
' How do we look at the world? I-low we look at the
world reflects our backgrounds as well as our day-
by-day work experiences and assignments. These
experiences are of utmost importance in helping us
and others see how we look at our culture vis-a-vis
others.
The Dynamic Political World
What Is the State of the World Political Map?
At any time it is useful to remember the state of the
world, or, better stated, the world political map. That
0
map reflects constant dynamism in name changes—
border adjustments, political realignments, as well as
flashpoints and conflict. There are a wide variety of
states with varying degrees of stability and instability.
It is important to keep in mind that world order and
disorder can be viewed in a variety of contexts. While
the term new political order may be in vogue this year,
there is not just one order, but many. At various times
and places on the world map, order or disorder can be
observed at local, regional, and macroregional levels.
We Live in Shared/Divided Spaces
All humans live to some degree in “bounded spaces.”
Some of those may be spaces defined by majority pop-
ulations, others defined by outside powers. Within
those bounded spaces, we often find people of varying
ethnic, religious, linguistic, racial, or other heritages.
The distribution of various groups often overlap.
Those groups may live in harmony-—shan'ng the same
work, play, worship, and family spaces or they may be
divided.
We Live in Local and Global Worlds
The world political map is much more complicated
than the standard reference maps that depict close to
200 political states. There are many scales at which
groups and communities interact. Some interactions
are local, others are global. It is important that those of
us who analyze political development acknowledge
these complexities.
Are We “Prisoners” of Our Maps?
In listening to the presenters the past several days and
in the discussions among panel members and the audi-
ence, it seems that we may, in fact, be “prisoners” of
our maps, especially the familiar political map of the
world—-which simplifies political space and rein-
forces the status quo. Do we still use time-honored
Mercator projections, which distort the spaces in the
high latitudes? Are the maps we use Europe centered,
as if subtly conveying the notion that Europe is the
most important region of the world? I-low do we look
at polar areas, with maps that have such areas at the
“top” and “bottom"? How do we look at the Pacific
Rim countries, with maps splitting the Pacific Ocean
187
Approved for Release: 2018/06/01 C00123268

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 205 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.