Documents / FOIA release

(Estimated Pub Date) the Challenge of Ethnic Conflict to National and International Order in the 1990S: Geographic Perspectives- October 1995

Central Intelligence Agency · 1995-10-01 · 205 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Central Intelligence Agency conference report, numbered RTT 95-10039 and dated October 1995, presents the proceedings of a conference held 30 September to 1 October 1993. The CIA's Geographic Resources Division sponsored the conference. In it, academic geographers, anthropologists and US Government officials examined ethnic conflict by region, covering Eastern Europe, the former Soviet Union, Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, Asia and South Asia. The report also discusses what these conflicts mean for US policy. It does not deal with UFOs or unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 186 …percent of the Frisians vote for the Frisian National Party. There is a Frisian academy; there…
Approved for Release: 2018/06/01 C00123268
replacement level soon. This is encouraging, because
Indonesia is the world’s most populous Islamic nation.
It is not a highly industrialized state, but the govem-
ment keeps pushing the idea publicly that small fami-
lies are happy families. I think that is worth
considering in many parts of the world that are grow-
ing rapidly.
General Discussion
DR. WIXMAN: In light of a comment made by Pro-
fessor Mikesell, I agree that, in terms of conflict reso-
lution, the example of Finland is superb. Why did the
Finns give such rights to the Swedes? Because they
had been under Russian rule. A little earlier in history,
when Ru_ssia took Finland from Sweden, it was anti-
Swedishism that became the symbolism in pro-Russi-
anism.
What we need to look at in terms of conflict resolution
is how reconciliation can take place. The reason
Armenians still hate Turks is that there has never been
reconciliation. Similarly there will be no ability for
Bosnian Croats, Serbs, and Muslims to live together
until reconciliation occurs.
DR. MIKESELL: Another example of a government
maintaining a keen awareness of minority-group
needs would be that ofrthe Netherlands. About 10 per-
cent of the country’s population is Frisian, but only
10 percent of the Frisians vote for the Frisian National
Party. There is a Frisian academy; there are chairs in
the language in Dutch universities. It is almost as
though the government has said to the Frisians, “You
are recognized. We would be pleased if you would
engage in activities to promote your identity. We’ ll
even subsidize it.”
Also, Switzerland recognized its Romansche-speakers
before they clamored for recognition. This is partly
because Mussolini considered Romansche to be an
Italian dialect, and that frightened the Swiss. But we
have so few other examples of that happening. I
would say that treating a 10-percent minority as
though it were a 49-percent minority works, but it
requires extraordinary sophistication on behalf of the
majority side.
There are four core-applied questions that come to
mind:
' Under what circumstances do ethnic groups become
politicized in the first place‘?
' Under what circumstances do politicized groups
come into conflict?
' What circumstances aggravate or ameliorate con-
flict?
' What are the implications of conflict for national!
intemational order?
Those are, it seems to me, the strongest set of applied
questions we should deal with. If there is a message
related to those questions, each one of which could be
addressed at some length, it seems to me, it is that we
are not living in a simple world. I will avoid the ugly
term complexification, but it seems to me that what
continues to come across is that context matters, and
context is a complicated array of things that come
together.
If there is a value to geography, it is not that it studies
a particular thing but that it tries to look at how things
come together and interact with core concepts like ter-
ritory, location, and environment. The key advantage
of a geographical perspective is its ability to try to
think about the relationships among and between phe-
nomena in places. This is where political science and
geography really come together. Politics and power
are expressed territorially, and looking at the relation-
ships among and between the territorial units and the
expression of powers is critical to understanding the
circumstances that lead to each of those four applied
questions that I noted.
DR. DE BLIJ: The examples that Dr. Mikesell men-
tioned of countries that were gracious to their minori-
ties were also countries that were relatively well off at
the time they made those concessions.
When Germany was thriving, the Turkish minority
was welcome. When Germany had an economic
recession, the Turkish minority became disliked.
176
Approved for Release: 2018/06/01 C00123268

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 205 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.