Documents / FOIA release
This Central Intelligence Agency conference report, numbered RTT 95-10039 and dated October 1995, presents the proceedings of a conference held 30 September to 1 October 1993. The CIA's Geographic Resources Division sponsored the conference. In it, academic geographers, anthropologists and US Government officials examined ethnic conflict by region, covering Eastern Europe, the former Soviet Union, Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, Asia and South Asia. The report also discusses what these conflicts mean for US policy. It does not deal with UFOs or unidentified aerial phenomena.
“Cooper”9 pages
Approved for Release: 2018/06/01 C00123268 I would like to reiterate a point that Professor Elbow made, which is that virtually all the conflicts today in Central America and also in South America are over land and resources. Indian populations inhabit rich forested areas, and there is a push-—not necessarily by the state but often by a combination of corrupt and greedy government officials, landless peasants, and multinationals—-to resettle the Indians and to take resources away from them. U In Central America the problem areas will be the low- lands. An examination of the remaining forestry resources of the region shows the correspondence between the forests and the lands currently inhabited by the region’s Indian populations. Although there are incipient indigenous group organizations throughout the areas, they are not strong enough to present any real opposition to outside forces. These organizations will need to be nurtured if they are going to be helpful in protecting the region’s remaining natural endow- ment. I General Discussion QUESTION: Would either of you like to comment on the possibility of racial strife in Cuba? MR. Cl-IAPIN: I don’t think that’s an issue. DR. ELBOW: Most of the whites are living in Miami. What’s left, from my understanding, is a fairly pre- dominantly rnulatto and black population. QUESTION: Would either or both speakers comment further on the role of nonstate actors such as NGOs and industry in conflicts in the region? I’m thinking in particular of attempts to develop oil in Ecuador. DR. ELBOW: Yes, I am quite familiar with the case of Ecuador. Both industry—in particular, but not exclu- sively, the oil industry—and NGOs are active. They are engaged in a sort of holy war, if you want to think of it that way, over the Amazon. The NGOs are trying to preserve what's left of the resources, and the oil compa- nies and the government are attempting to mine them. Ecuador has, according to the latest reports, something on the order of about 20 years worth of oil left, and, as far as I can determine, industry and government are trying to get it out in 15 years. The govemment has allowed the oil companies to move into areas that are supposedly reserved for Indians and are not supposed to be exploited. The oil companies can pretty much go wherever they want to. Now, because of bad press, the government and the oil companies as well have had to do a little bit to clean up their act. So pollution has per- haps been reduced, but the real problem is that where oil companies go, others follow. The development of roads by the oil companies has led to the opening up of the region to colonization. When oil companies clear a little stretch of road that is 10 meters or more wide, the colonists come in and take out the rest. MR. CHAPIN: Initially, when the oil development started down in the Amazon area, CONOCO and an Indian group was involved. Then the National Resources Defense Counsel and others became engaged. The theory behind the outside involvement was that negative publicity would pressure CONOCO to act responsibly. A lot of NGOs then got involved, Indian groups protested CONOCO actions, and CONOCO pulled out. When CONOCO left, a number of small wildcat groups, who could not be pressured on anything, went in and started taking it over. So that is the current situation. QUESTION: The UN working group on the rights of indigenous people has been developing a declaration that will eventually work its way up in the UN system. This declaration addresses the issue of rights and con- trol of resources by indigenous peoples. Do you see much of a chance for this declaration being passed by the UN, and, if so, how would that impact upon the relationship between indigenous peoples and the state? Would it tend to lessen friction or increase it? MR. CHAPIN: I don’t think it will have much effect at all simply because any resolution passed by the UN has no legal status in any of these countries. If 97 Approved for Release: 2018/06/01 C00123268
Not linked to a story yet.
FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 205 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.