Documents / FOIA release

Soviet Public Treatment of President Reagan Since November 1980

Central Intelligence Agency · 1984-02-03 · 36 pages · text by GLM-OCR

This Central Intelligence Agency report, dated 3 February 1984, reviews how Soviet leaders, well-connected commentators and routine media treated President Reagan from November 1980 onward. It finds that Moscow twice softened its line: once after the 1980 election and again when Andropov came to power. After the Korean airliner was shot down, Soviet treatment of Reagan became the most abusive in years. Attached excerpts include a Yakovlev article claiming Reagan believes in flying saucers.

  • p. 2 …in Soviet expectations for U.S.-Soviet cooperation were most clearly registered. 11. o Routine commentary…
  • p. 4 …one reasonable road--peaceful coexistence, mutually advantageous cooperation. 29. But there are also such statesmen in…
  • p. 6 …on confrontation; not on peaceful mutually beneficial cooperation, but on the use of trade to military…
  • p. 11 …They wish lasting peace and mutually beneficial cooperation. 86. Andropov, speech at CPSU Central Committee plenum…
  • p. 19 …to a policy of peace and international cooperation. ## 148. Andropov interview (PRAVDA, 25 Jan 84) 149…
  • p. 25 …agreements in trade and scientific-technical cooperation, agreements signed by the Government of the United States…
  • p. 29 …Are we not overestimating our own strength? Can international security and international cooperation seriously be expected…
  • p. 31 …climate of mutual trust, mutual understanding and cooperation in the world. 245. His Holiness Pimen, Patriarch…
  • p. 33 …rapid demolition of the structure of international cooperation built by the efforts of many countries on…

Read from the scan by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word.

## UNCLASSIFIED FOUO

Document 2 of 2 AGAL Concatenated Database

responsibility resort to overt lies. There have been many instances when the current leaders in Washington have flagrantly distorted the truth and deliberately lied to the public. That was the case in the most recent statements made by President Reagan about Soviet policy.

## 250. Kobysh (LITERATURNAYA GAZETA, 6 Apr 83)

251. [In his] 1 April speech and in previous speeches, R. Reagan cast aside all Easter rhetoric and explained quite clearly and bluntly that the Administration that he heads, far from intending to renounce its military preparations on a monstrous scale and its hegemonist aggressive course, actually contemplates something still more sinister. Playing with words, he presented to the public in the guise of "ABM defense" the announcement that the United States is embarking on the implementation of a vast new, purely aggressive program of military preparations, mainly covering space. This announcement was further evidence that the present U.S. Government is not simply preparing for nuclear war, but has set a course toward unleashing such a war.

252. Valentin Falin, IZVESTIYA political observer (IZVESTIYA, 14 Aug 83)

253. And what does the U.S. leadership think now? It links the maintenance of peace between our states to the United States' acquisition of military superiority in addition to the USSR's renunciation of a socialist social system. In other words, the Soviet Union must learn to be at the United States' beck and call or it will only have itself to blame. It is perfectly obvious that this view has nothing in common with the "Basic Principles of Mutual Relations between the USSR and the United States" which the U.S. leader sealed with his signature in May 1972. . . .

254. True, for some time now representatives of the present administration have been going in for soft-pedaling. They have been transforming R. Reagan from a dashing mindless horseman into a soft-hearted "peace champion." A broad stream of misinformation is being broadcast in which they want to whitewash the U.S. stance at the talks on nuclear arms in Europe and on strategic arms limitation and reduction.

## 255. Arkadiy Sakhnin (LITERATURNAYA GAZETA, 5 Oct 83)

256. Under pressure from the peoples, imperialism seemed to accept the incipient detente. But it could not keep it up. What do you mean, detente?! So much power! Must rule the world!

257. A familiar turn. We heard it from the madman [Hitler]. It was also heard by a smart master of ceremonies, an actor from the

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

FOIA release, from the cia-readingroom collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. The text was read from the page images by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word. 36 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.