Documents / Hearing transcript

Unidentified flying objects: hearing before the Committee on Armed Forces of the House of Representatives, Eighty-ninth Congress, second session, April 5, 1966 ...

U.S. House Committee on Armed Services · 1966-04-05 · 88 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the printed transcript of an April 5, 1966 hearing of the U.S. House Committee on Armed Services on unidentified flying objects. Air Force Secretary Harold Brown testified that 9,501 of 10,147 sightings from 1947 through 1965 had been identified and that no threat or extraterrestrial evidence had been found. The record includes the Scientific Advisory Board ad hoc committee report recommending university studies and the Air Force's marsh gas explanation for the Dexter and Hillsdale, Michigan sightings. Members also questioned J. Allen Hynek and Maj. Hector Quintanilla about the Exeter, New Hampshire case.

  • p. 11 …Allen and Anderson, Norman. Dis- cusses the nature of the universe; astronomy and cosmology, published by…
5997
tions and material reviewed and discussed, are available in the SAB secretariat
offices for review by authorized persons or agencies.
Approved by:
HAROLD A. STEINER,
Lieutenant Colonel, USAF,
Assistant Secretary, USAF scientific Advisory Board.
PROJECT BLUE BOOK
The U.S. Air Force has the responsibility under the Department of Defense
for the investigation of unidentified flying objects (UFO's). The name of this
program, which has been in operation since 1948, is Project Blue Book. It has
been identified in the past as Project Sign and Project Grudge.
Air Force interest in unidentified flying objects is related directly to the Air
Force responsibility for the air defense of the United States. Procedures for
conducting this program are established by Mr Force Regulation 200-2.
The objectives of the Project Blue Book are twofold: first, to determine
whether UFO's pose a threat to the security of the United States; and, second, to
determine whether UFO's exhibit any unique scientific information or advanced
technology which could contribute to scientific or technical research. In the
course of accomplishing these objectives, Project Blue Book strives to identify
and explain all UFO sightings reported to the Air Force.
HOW THE PROGRAM IS CONDUCTED
The program is conducted in three phases. The first phase includes receipt
of UFO reports and initial investigation of the reports. The Air Force base
nearest the location of a reported sighting is charged with the responsibility of
investigating the sighting and forwarding the information to the Project Blue
Book Office at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.
If the initial investigation does not reveal a positive identification or explana-
tion, a second phase of more intensive analysis is conducted by the Project Blue
Book Office. Each case is objectively and scientifically analyzed and, if neces-
sary, all of the scientific facilities available to the Air Force can be used to assist
in arriving at an identification or explanation. All personnel associated with the
investigation, analysis, and evaluation efforts of the project view each report
with a scientific approach and an open mind.
The third phase of the program is dissemination of information concerning
UFO sightings, evaluations, and statistics. This is accomplished by the Secre-
tary of the Air Force, Office of Information.
The Air Force defines an unidentified flying object as any aerial object which
the observer is unable to identify.
Reports of unfamiliar objects in the sky are submitted to the Air Force from
many sources. These sources include military and civilian pilots, weather ob-
servers, amateur astronomers, business and professional men and women, and
housewives, etc.
Frequently such objects as missiles, balloons, birds, kites, searchlights, aircraft
navigation and anticollision beacons, jet engine exhaust, condensation trails,
astronomical bodies and meteorological phenomena are mistakenly reported as
unidentified flying objects.
The Air Force groups its evaluations of UFO reports under three general head-
ings: (1) identified, (2) insufficient data, and (3) unidentified.
Identified reports are those for which sufficient specific information has been
accumulated and evaluated to permit a positive identification or explanation of
the object.
Reports categorized as "Insufficient Data" are those for which one or more ele-
ments of information essential for evaluation are missing. Some examples are
the omission of the duration of the sighting, date, time, location, pesition in the
sky, weather conditions, and the manner of appearance or disappearance. If the
element is missing and there is an indication that the sighting may be of a
security, scientific, technical, or public interest value, the Project Blue Book Office
conducts an additional investigation and every attempt is made to obtain the in-
formation necessary for identification. However, in some instances, essential in-
formation cannot be obtained, and no further action can be taken.
50-066 0-66—No.55-2

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 88 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.