Documents / Hearing transcript
This is the printed transcript of an April 5, 1966 hearing of the U.S. House Committee on Armed Services on unidentified flying objects. Air Force Secretary Harold Brown testified that 9,501 of 10,147 sightings from 1947 through 1965 had been identified and that no threat or extraterrestrial evidence had been found. The record includes the Scientific Advisory Board ad hoc committee report recommending university studies and the Air Force's marsh gas explanation for the Dexter and Hillsdale, Michigan sightings. Members also questioned J. Allen Hynek and Maj. Hector Quintanilla about the Exeter, New Hampshire case.
“Fuller”4 pages
6068 Mr. PRICE. If they did travel in outer space there would be a record somewhere of their travels in outer space? Dr. HYNEK. I would certainly think so, and this, of course, is I think one of the most potent arguments against extraterrestial visita- tion by intelligences, unless they were so superintelligent they knew how to evade completely our surveillances. I think this would be pretty difficult. Mr. PRICE. As they left their normal orbit they could be tracked and followed? Dr. HYNEK. Yes, sir. Mr. PRICE. As they left the orbit? Dr. HYNEK. To the best of my understanding, they certainly could be. The CHAIRMAN. Dr. Hall. Mr. HALL. Mr. Chairman, I just wanted to thank the Secretary and his distinguished guests for this, and say for some time we have even had space conventions down in the Ozarks, in the last 13 years, and it would seem obvious to me in view of the report today those who take trips by the use of hullucinatory drugs are almost synonymous with the number of space sightings we have had reported here today, namely, in the order of 10,000. To me it indicates a decrease in the mores and the fiber of those who would subject themselves to hulluci- natory influences in the first place. Thank you. The CHAIRMAN. Mr. Stratton? Mr. STRATTON. You mentioned something from Life magazine, Mr. Chairman. There were two pictures in Life magazine I think we would like an explanation of. One of them was a red object which was clearly visible in the photograph. The other were two lights, I think, taken in Sidney Harbor, one at one position and one atanother, and then there was the third photograph. I wonder if the Doctor could give us what the explanation is of these? Dr. HYNEK. Well, sir, unless one has the original negative, there is very little photoanalysis that can be done. It is said a picture is worth a thousand words, but I think in this case it is the other way around, because generally it has been our experience, and I think Major Quintanilla will bear me out, that when we do have hoaxesthey very frequently are accompanied by photographs. Mr. STRATTON. I appreciate it is possible to doctor up negatives. Let me put it the other way around. Have these three incidents which are reported photographically in Life magazine been examined by you, and, if so, what are your findings with regard to them? Dr. HYNEK. No, sir; they have not been examined by me, because I do not have the original negatives. Mr. STRATTON. Are these incidents listed in the list that you havecompiled, and which the Secretary has told us 95 percent are explain- able? Dr. HYNEK. No, sir. These particular pictures are not in my list since I don't know enough about them. Mr: STRATToN. Doctor, I would suggest since these have had very prominent circulation, in a magazine of some prominence in the coun-try, that we ought to examine these particular things and determine whether they are hoaxes or not. If anything is disturbing the Amen-
Hearing transcript, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 88 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.