Documents / Hearing transcript

Unidentified flying objects: hearing before the Committee on Armed Forces of the House of Representatives, Eighty-ninth Congress, second session, April 5, 1966 ...

U.S. House Committee on Armed Services · 1966-04-05 · 88 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the printed transcript of an April 5, 1966 hearing of the U.S. House Committee on Armed Services on unidentified flying objects. Air Force Secretary Harold Brown testified that 9,501 of 10,147 sightings from 1947 through 1965 had been identified and that no threat or extraterrestrial evidence had been found. The record includes the Scientific Advisory Board ad hoc committee report recommending university studies and the Air Force's marsh gas explanation for the Dexter and Hillsdale, Michigan sightings. Members also questioned J. Allen Hynek and Maj. Hector Quintanilla about the Exeter, New Hampshire case.

6059
of
investigating
the
sightings,
and
the
public.
The
conclusions
reached
have
been
assisted
by
two
more
examinations
of
the
files
of
Project
Blue
Book,
the
Air
Force
name
for
its
study
and
its
verdicts
on
UFO
reports.
A
main
conclusion
can
be
briefly
stated.
It
is
that
the
Air
Force
is
misleading
the
public
by
it
continuing
campaign
to
produce
and
maintain
belief
that
all
sight-
ings
can
be
explained
away
as
misidentifications
of
familiar
objects,
such
as
balloons,
stars,
and
aircraft.
The
logical
assumption,
backed
by
much
circumstantial evidence,
is
that the
Air
Force
is
deliberately
misleading the
public.
In
this
campaign
the
Air
Force,
backed
by
normal
public respect
for
the
military
and
for
authoritative
statements,
and
also
assisted
by
the
natural
human
dis-
inclination
to
think
uncommonly
or
to
be
laughed
at,
has
been
largely
successful.
However,
the
Air
Force
success
in
having
the
public
believe
what
it
wants
it
to
believe
respecting
UFO's
is
steadily
and
conspicuously
lessening.
More
and
more
skepticism
is
being
voiced
in
newspapers
and
by
citizens.
Another
chief conclusion
is
this:
no
energetic
and
thorough
effort
to
investi-
gate the
unidentified
flying
object
phenomenon
is
being
made
by
the Air
Force
or
ever
has
been
made
by
it.
And
this
charge
holds true
respect
any
other
Gov-
ernment
agency
and
respecting
what
has
been
termed
the Nation's
scientific
community.
Reasons
for
the
persevering
Air
Force performance are
unknown
to
the
public.
In
the
speculation
one
of the
following three
reasons
is
commonly
advanced:
the
Air
Force
fears
national
panic
if
the
truth
about
the
UFO's
were
told;
the
Air
Force
feels
it
is
stuck
with
its
story;
or
the
Air
Force
is
silenced
by
the
Central
Intelligence
Agency.
The
first
alleged
reason,
however
uncomplimentary
to
the
intelligence
of
our
citizens,
is
one
that
has
been
heard at the
Capitol
off
and on
for
approaching
20
years.
Some
speculate
it
may
be
the reason
the
Air
Force has
given to
the
chair-
men
of
the
two
congressional
space
committees
in
its
understood
endeavor
to
hold
off
a
congressional
investigation
of
the
UFO
subject.
What
is
the
truth
about
the
UFO's?
It
is
quite
possible
that
no
one on
this
earth
knows.
A
veteran
New
England
congressional
leader,
who
was
in
a
position
to
know,
told
this
writer
that the Air
Force
didn't
know
what
they
are.
Officials
of
the
Central
Intelligence
Agency
ought
to
know
if
anyone
does,
yet
a
former head
ofthe
CIA,
Adm.
R.
H.
Hillenkootter, affirmed
half
a
dozen
years
ago
that
he
did
not
believe
in
the Air
Force
explainings-away
;
but
he
did
not
indicate
he
thought
he
thought
he
knows
the
truth
of the matter.
An
increasing
number
of
good
observers hold
that
a
sizable
minority of the
sightings—many
sightings
presumably
are
misidentifications—represent
some-
thing
new
and unknown.
A
large
number
of these
observers,
who
include
veteran
pilots,
radar
operators, air
traffic
controllers,
teachers,
astronomers,
and
other
experts, hold that the
unknown UFO's
are
extraterrestrial.
To
all
this
Air
Force
officials
can
and do
respond that not
a
single
tangible
bit
of evidence of
any
such
UFO
has
been found. This
is
a
mighty
strong argu-
ment,
the
strongest
argument
of the
so-called
explainers
-away.
Yet
to
an
augmenting
number
of
competent
observers the evidence
grows
stronger that
some
of the
UFO's
are
real
and
really
unknown. So
very
many
impressive
sightings can't
be
explained
away,
it
is
said.
"From
the United
States,
from
Argentina,
Uruguay,
Portugal,
France, Ant-
arctica,
and
Australia
(from
four
continents)
have
come
the rash of
reports ofsightings
of
unidentified flying
objects
(UFO's).
The
sightings
have
been the
most numerous
since 1957."
So summarized
a
United Press
International
dis-
patch
last
August.
First
and
last,
few
presumably
will
challenge
a
conclusion
that the mystery
and
the problem of the
unidentified flying
object
remain with
this
world.
And
as
for the Air Force, with
its
intensive
campaign
to explain
away
every
UFO
sighting,
it
might
listen
to the recent advice of
a
veteran astronomer,
Dr.
I.
M.
Levitt, director
of the Fels Planetarium, Franklin
Institute,
Philadelphia,
said:
"It
would be
well
if
our
Project
Blue
Book
officials
were
simply to indicate
that sightings in
a
minority of cases
cannot be
explained. It
would
clear
the
air
of
a
great deal of misunderstanding
and
mistrust of this
group by the
intelligent
laymen and
observers
who
have
seen objects in the sky."

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 88 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.