Documents / Hearing transcript

Unidentified flying objects: hearing before the Committee on Armed Forces of the House of Representatives, Eighty-ninth Congress, second session, April 5, 1966 ...

U.S. House Committee on Armed Services · 1966-04-05 · 88 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the printed transcript of an April 5, 1966 hearing of the U.S. House Committee on Armed Services on unidentified flying objects. Air Force Secretary Harold Brown testified that 9,501 of 10,147 sightings from 1947 through 1965 had been identified and that no threat or extraterrestrial evidence had been found. The record includes the Scientific Advisory Board ad hoc committee report recommending university studies and the Air Force's marsh gas explanation for the Dexter and Hillsdale, Michigan sightings. Members also questioned J. Allen Hynek and Maj. Hector Quintanilla about the Exeter, New Hampshire case.

  • p. 9 …information or advanced technology which could contribute to scientific or technical research. In the course of…
  • p. 30 6018 returning, so Bertrand and Muscarello advanced into the field. As the police officer played his…
  • p. 71 …In the speculation one of the following three reasons is commonly advanced: the Air Force fears…
  • p. 73 …You stated that you may check out my comments with the proper authorities. Knowing in advance…
  • p. 77 …determine if UFO's exhibit any advanced technology which the United States could put to use…
  • p. 78 6066 Of the sightings so far checked out, less than 2 percent of the total are…
6056
group,
who
went
to
the
scene to
investigate
for
NICAP.
The
latter
stands
for
National
Investigations
Committee on
Aerial
Phenomena,
the
unofficial
but
re-
sponsible
Washington
organization.
The
Fowler
charges are
in
the
files
of
Blue
Book
and
of
NICAP.
Fowler
talked
with
witnesses
and
others
and
said
he
was
told
that
Pease
AFB
officers
had
asked
the
police
and
a
local
newspaper
correspondent
not
to
mention
the
sightings.
The
request
was
put
to
the
police
on
the
ground
people
would
be
alarmed
if
told
the
facts,
it
is
stated.
Major
Quintanilla,
informed
of
this
charge,
said
that
"I
would
not
allow
any
suppression
of
news."
However,
it is
an
impression
in
Washington
that
officers
a
good
deal
higher
than
Major
Quintanilla
would
not
exert themselves
to
prevent
news
suppression
of
UFO
sightings.
The
Haverhill
(Mass.)
Gazette
wrote
an
editorial
on
this
UFO
in
the
neigh-
borhood,
in
which
it
said:
"So
many
have
reported seeing
it
(the
Exeter
UFO)
and
their
descriptions
jibe
so
closely
that,
unless
they
have banded
together
in
one
large
hoax,
their
stories
must
be
given
credence."
[From
the
Portland
(Maine)
Evening
Express,
Jan.
20,
19661
THOSE
"FLYING
SAUCERS"—AIR
FORCE
BRUSHES OFF
FLOOD
OF SIGHTINGS IN
SOUTHWEST
(Editor's
note:
This
is
the fourth of
a
series
about
UFO's
(unidentified
flying
objects)
by
Bulkley
S.
Griffin,
executive
editor
of the
Evening
Express,
Wash-
ington bureau.)
WASHINGTON,
D.C.—A
good
2
weeks
after
the
flood
of
unidentified flying
object
(UFO)
sightings
last
August
over
Oklahoma and
other
Southwestern
States,
Tinker Air
Force Base,
Oklahoma
City,
produced
its
formal
survey
and
judg-
ment.
It
sent
this
several
-page
explanation
of
sightings in
its
wide
area
to
Project
Blue
Book,
the Air
Force
office
in
charge
of the
UFO
investigations
and
conclusions.
This
report
is
a
good
example
of
Air
Force
anti
-UFO
propaganda.
Except
for
mention
of
one
specific
sighting—which
was
decreed
to
be
a
weather
baloon—
the report
is
generalized, pulling
out
all
the
stops
on
the
possibilities
of
citizens
making
mistakes
and
including
a
statement
from
the
official
of
a
planetarium
in
Oklahoma
City
whose
text
was
that
"the average person
is
uneducated as
to
what
the
sky
normally
looks
like."
Interviews with
military
experts
are
given
which
mention
unusually
brightstars
at
this
time
of
year,
a
haze
that
reflects
things
from
the ground, the
fre-
quency
of
weather
balloons
and
so
on.
An
impressive
but
superficial
case
is
made
for
weather
balloons
as
fooling
people into
thinking
they are
seeing
a
UFO.
The
number
released daily in
the
Oklahoma
area
is considerable.
But
the fact
is
that the
citizens
thereabouts
have
lived
with
these balloons
day
after
day and
year
after
year
and by
now
must
be
fairly
well acquainted with
what
they look
like
and
how
they
act.
They
are
also pretty well
acquainted
with
stars,
which at
the
moment
may
be supplanting
balloons
as the
favorite
explanation
put
forth
by
Project
Blue Book.
The
Tinker
AFB
report did
not need to
avoid
mention of
particular sightings.
The
Oklahoma Highway
Patrol
teletype
reported
a number
of
sightings well
worth
investigation
and
these
teletype
UFO
reports
were
relayed to
all
major news-
papers,
wire
services
and
TV
and
radio
stations
across the State of
Oklahoma;
also to
the
weather wire
teletype
system.
They
were
available to sincere
Air
Force
investigators.
The
failure
to interview witnesses could
be termed
negative Air Force
prop-
aganda.
The highway
patrol
messages
named
close to
a
dozen
civilian
wit-
nesses usually with addresses,
and
the
number
of
highway
patrol
officers
that
had
sightings
must have
totaled
two
dozen
and more. Yet
the formal August 20
re-
port
from Tinker
shows
interviews with but
two
civilians
and two
police
officers.
Maj. Hector
Quintanilla, in
command
of Project
Blue Book, says the Air
Force seeks interviews With persons
who
call
up and whose names
they learn.
"We
are not
interested in persons
who
go
to the newspapers or to radio
and
TV
stations,"
he
said.
The wisdom
of
this exclusion
is
of course wide open
to ques-
tion—assuming that the Air Force
is
seeking information.

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 88 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.