Documents / Hearing transcript

Unidentified flying objects: hearing before the Committee on Armed Forces of the House of Representatives, Eighty-ninth Congress, second session, April 5, 1966 ...

U.S. House Committee on Armed Services · 1966-04-05 · 88 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the printed transcript of an April 5, 1966 hearing of the U.S. House Committee on Armed Services on unidentified flying objects. Air Force Secretary Harold Brown testified that 9,501 of 10,147 sightings from 1947 through 1965 had been identified and that no threat or extraterrestrial evidence had been found. The record includes the Scientific Advisory Board ad hoc committee report recommending university studies and the Air Force's marsh gas explanation for the Dexter and Hillsdale, Michigan sightings. Members also questioned J. Allen Hynek and Maj. Hector Quintanilla about the Exeter, New Hampshire case.

  • p. 24 …John Fuller of Saturday Review may be getting in touch with you about these sightings. He…
  • p. 26 …HUNT-MUSCARELLO)) TRADE WINDS (By John G. Fuller) When the tidal wave of reports about unidentified…
  • p. 54 …John Fuller has given of it in Look magazine. I cannot vouch for the authenticity of…
  • p. 85 …about, Exeter, N.H., the one Mr. Fuller has written about in several magazines. I understand…
6047
Mr.
Drummond
goes
on
to
state,
"We
need
to
get
all
the
data
drawn
together
in
one
place
and
examined
far
more
objectively
than
anyone has done
so
far.
A
stable
public
opinion
will
come
from
a
trustworthy
look
at
the
evidence,
not
from
belittling
it.
"The
time
has
come
for the President
or Congress
to
name
an
objective
and
respected
panel
to
investigate,
appraise,
and
report
on
all
present
and
future
evi-
dence
about
what
is
going
on."
I
agree
fully
with
Mr.
Drummond's
statements.
I
also
suggest
you
scan
the
enclosed
series
of
six
articles
by
Bulkley
Griffin
of
the
Griffin-Larrabee
News
Bureau
here.
In
the
last
of
his
articles,
published
last
January,
Mr.
Griffin
says,
"A
main
conclusion
can
be
briefly
stated. It
is
that
the
Air
Force
is
mis-
leading
the
public
by
its
continuing
campaign
to
produce
and
maintain
belief
that
all
sightings
can
be
explained
away
as
misidentification
of
familiar
objects,
such
as
balloons,
stars,
and
aircraft."
I
have
just
today
received
a
number
of
telegrams urging
a
congressional
inves-tigation
of
UFO's.
One
is
from
retired
Air
Force
Col.
Harold
R.
Brown,
Ard-
more,
Tenn.,
who
says,
"I
have
seen
UFO.
Will
be
available
to
testify."
Another,
from
Mrs.
Ethyle
M.
Davis,
Eugene,
Oreg.,
reads,
"9
out
of
10
people
want
truth
of
UFO's.
Press your
investigation
to
the
fullest."
Ronald
Colier
of
Los
Angeles,
who
identifies
himself
as
"a
scientist
from
MIT,"
urges that
you
"do
everything in
your
power
to
make
Air
Force
Project
Blue
Book
(the Air Force
name
for
its
study
and
verdicts
on
UFO
reports)
known
to
the
people."
Are
we
to
assume
that
everyone
who
says
he has
seen
UFO's
is
an
unreliable
witness?
A
UPI
story
out
of
Ann
Arbor,
Mich.,
dated
March
21, 1966,
states
that
"at
least
40
persons, including
12
policemen,
said
today
that they
saw a
strange
flying
object
guarded
by
4
sister
ships
land
in
a
swamp
near
here
Sunday
night."
Matt
Surrell
of
Station
WJR,
Detroit,
cites
an
eye
witness
account
of
a
recent
UFO
sighting
by Emile
Grenier of
Ann
Arbor,
an
aeronautical engineer
employed
by
Ford
Motor
Co.
He
points
out
that
an
aeronautical
engineer
can
hardly
be
considered
an
untrustworthy
witness.
In
the
firm
belief
that the
American
public
deserves
a
better
explanation
than
that
thus far
given
by
the
Air
Force,
I
strongly
recommend
that there
be
a
com-
mittee
investigation
of the
UFO
phenomena.
I
think
we
owe
it
to the people
to
establish
credibility
regarding
UFO's
and
to
produce the
greatest
possible
enlightenment
on
this subject.
Kindest
personal
regards.
Sincerely,
Enclosures.
GERALD
R.
FORD,
Member
of Congress.
[From
the
Washington
Post,
Mar.
27,
1966]
DON'T SNEER AT
UFO's
(By
Roscoe
Drummond)You
can't
dismiss the
possibility
that
some
of the
unidentified flying objects,
which so
many
people
have
sighted
in
so
many
places,
are
real.
There
are,
of
course,
UFO
buffs
who
seem
to
want
to believe
everything
and
discount
logical
explanations.
But
Air Force
officials
assigned to
check
up
on
these sightings
seem
so
bored
and
skeptical
that
many
people
have
the impression
that they think the
public
would
panic
if all
the
facts
were brought out
into
the
open.
Let's
not
leave the search for
more
knowledge
to
those
who
tend to accept
everything
uncritically
or
to those
who
tend to dismiss every
UFO
as
ridiculous.
The
time has
come
for the President or Congress
to
name
an
objective
and
respected
panel to
investigate,
appraise
and
report
on
all
present
and
future
evidence
about
what
is
going on.
Last week,
more
than 100
persons
(some
of
them
trained observers) reported
seeing "flying
saucers"
in
seven
States,
from Maine
to
Texas
to Colorado.
Last
year, project
Blue Book,
the small Air Force
unit created to
keep
tabs
on
these things, received
886
reports of
UFO
sightings.
During the
last
2
years, the National Investigations
Committee on
Aerial
Phe-
nomena, a
private
group headed by
a
retired
Naval Academy Marine Corps
pilot,
received 3,000 such
reports.
During the past
10
years, the
NICAP
received
some
8,000 reports
and says that
1,500 of them "seem
pretty substantial
and unexplained."

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 88 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.