Documents / Hearing transcript

Unidentified flying objects: hearing before the Committee on Armed Forces of the House of Representatives, Eighty-ninth Congress, second session, April 5, 1966 ...

U.S. House Committee on Armed Services · 1966-04-05 · 88 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the printed transcript of an April 5, 1966 hearing of the U.S. House Committee on Armed Services on unidentified flying objects. Air Force Secretary Harold Brown testified that 9,501 of 10,147 sightings from 1947 through 1965 had been identified and that no threat or extraterrestrial evidence had been found. The record includes the Scientific Advisory Board ad hoc committee report recommending university studies and the Air Force's marsh gas explanation for the Dexter and Hillsdale, Michigan sightings. Members also questioned J. Allen Hynek and Maj. Hector Quintanilla about the Exeter, New Hampshire case.

6009
The
CHAIRMAN.
What
you
have
recommended
is
being
done
now?
Dr.
HYNEK.
It
is
about to be done,
I
believe.
The
CHAIRMAN.
Is
about
to
be
done?
Dr.
HYNEK.
Yes.
I
should
like
to
make
one
comment:
The
puzzling
thing
is
that
one
would
think
many
more
people
would
see
these flying
objects
than
do.
There
should be
many
more
wit-
nesses.
We
should
see
a
craft,
if
it
actually
exists
as
a
tangible
thing,
and
we
should
see
it
go
from
point
to
point.
This
doesn't
seem
to
happen.
Also,
there
should be far
more
radar
sightings.
During
the
international
geophysical year,
I
was
in
charge of
the
optical
satellite
tracking
program,
and
you would
think with the
surveillance
that the
astronomers
placed
on
the
sky,
if
these
objects existed
as
tangible
objects,
surely
these
astronomers
would
have
seen
more
than
they
did.
It
is
a
dilemma.
It
is
a
puzzle,
as
you
say,
as to
how
responsible
people
can
report
such
objects,
and
that
they
are
not obvious to
scientists.
The
CHAIRMAN.
An
then
they
see
them and
they
disappear
and
they
don't
know
where
they go,
and
they land
in these
remote
places
where
there
is
no
intelligence
to
procure?
Dr.
HYNEK.
I
Would say
SO,
yes,
sir.
The
CHAIRMAN.
We
don't
know
where
they go,
who
they
have
on
board,
we
see
them
a few moments, and
then they are
gone.
This
is
the
end
of
that.
This
is
what
puzzles
me.
I am
not going
to ask
further
questions,
because
I am
not knowledgeable with
respect to
the
varying
reports
that
have
been
made.
So
I
will
turn
it
over to
some
of
the
experts,
and
I
will start
with
Mr.
Bates.
Mr.
BATES.
Mr.
Chairman,
I
don't
know—if
I
have
to qualitfy
on
that
basis.
But,
Secretary
Brown,
you
indicated
no
one of
scientific
knowledge
in
your
organization
has
concluded
these
phenomena come from
extra-
terrestrial
sources?
Secretary
BROWN.
That
is
correct.
We
know
of
no phenomena
or
vehicles, intelligently
guided,
which have
come from
extraterrestrial
sources.
I
excluded meteors,
which
do come from
extraterrestrial
Sources.
Mr.
BATES. Is
this
your
conclusion,
Doctor?
Dr.
HYNEK.
This
is
also
my
conclusion.
I
know
of
no
competent
scientist
today
who
would argue the
sightings
which
do
puzzle
intel-
ligent people.
Puzzling
cases
exist,
but
I
know
of
no
competent
scien-
tist
who
would say that there
objects
come from
outer space.
Mr.
BATES.
Then what
you
are looking for
is
an
explanation in nat-
ural
phenomena,
thus far
you have not determined the
factors involved
in
it?
Dr.
HYNEK.
Yes.
Mr.
BATES.
But
the
interesting
thing,
of
course
is
we
have
so
many
prominent
people in the
scientific
world here
who
have taken a
position,
a
rather strong position—I have
here
a
letter
from a
constituent
of
mine.
He
is
a
project administrator or engineer in the
MINUTEMAN
program. That
is
a
responsible position,
would
we
say?
General
McCoNNELL.
Yes.
Mr.
BATES.
On
the basis
of
scientific ability
he has been given a
rather important
position
toward the security
of
this
country;
is
that
correct?

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 88 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.