Documents / Report

AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1

All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office · 2024-03 · 63 pages · text from the file's own layer

The Department of Defense All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office issued Volume I of its Historical Record Report in February 2024. It reviews U.S. Government UAP investigations since 1945, drawing on classified and unclassified archives and about 30 interviews. AARO found no evidence that any sighting represented extraterrestrial technology and no empirical evidence of reverse-engineering programs, attributing such claims to misidentified sensitive programs, the unapproved KONA BLUE proposal and circular reporting. It also found an alleged crash sample to be an ordinary terrestrial alloy.

  • p. 2 …19 National Academy of Sciences Assessment of the Condon Report (Late 1968) ...................... 20 Carter Administration Tasking…
  • p. 20 …Hynek—a panel of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) was tasked in late 1968 to…
  • p. 50 …50 The National Academy of Sciences Panel Assessment of the Condon Report; https://www.apps.dtic…
3
Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group (AOIMSG) /
Airborne Object Identification and Management Executive Management Committee
(AOIMEXEC) (November 2021-June 2022) ............................................................................ 24
UAP Independent Study Team (UAPIST) (June 2022-September 2023)................................. 25
All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) (Established July 15, 2022) ....................... 25
Foreign and Academic Investigatory Efforts ............................................................................ 26
Key Findings ............................................................................................................................. 27
SECTION V: Assessment of Interviewee Claims of USG Involvement in Hidden UAP Programs ......... 28
Summary ................................................................................................................................... 28
Primary Narrative ...................................................................................................................... 28
Secondary Narrative .................................................................................................................. 30
Findings............................................................................................................................................... 30
No Official UAP Nondisclosure Agreements Discovered .................................................................. 30
Former CIA Official Involvement in Movement of Alleged Material Recovered from a UAP Crash
Denied on the Record.......................................................................................................................... 31
The 1961 Special National Intelligence Estimate on “UFOs” Assessed to be Not Authentic ............ 31
Aliens Observing Material Test a Likely Misunderstanding of an Authentic, Non-UAP Program
Activity ............................................................................................................................................... 31
Allegation that a Former U.S. military Service Member Touched an Extraterrestrial Spacecraft ...... 32
The UAP with Peculiar Characteristics Refers to an Authentic, Non-UAP-Related SAP.................. 32
Extraterrestrial Disclosure Study Confirmed; Not White House-Sponsored ...................................... 32
Aerospace Companies Denied Involvement in Recovering Extraterrestrial Craft.............................. 32
Sample of Alleged Alien Spacecraft is an Ordinary, Terrestrial, Metal Alloy ................................... 32
AARO Investigating Unresolved Historical Nuclear-Related UAP Cases ......................................... 33
SECTION VI: Investigation into Named USG Sensitive Programs .......................................................... 33
Summary ................................................................................................................................... 33
Process for Protecting Sensitive Programs while Investigating Interviewee Claims................ 34
Findings ..................................................................................................................................... 34
One Private Program Mistaken for USG Program .............................................................................. 34
KONA BLUE: A Proposed UAP Recovery and Reverse-Engineering Program ............................... 34
Unnecessary IC Program Expansion................................................................................................... 35
Nexus of Proponents of the USG UAP Reverse-Engineering Allegation .......................................... 35
SECTION VII: Historical Context of UAP Investigatory Efforts Since 1945 .......................................... 36
Summary ................................................................................................................................... 36
Commonalities of 20th and 21st Century UAP Investigations ................................................... 37

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 63 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.