Documents / Report

aaro historical record report volume 1 2024

The Black Vault · 64 pages · text from the file's own layer

The Department of Defense All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) issued Volume I of its Historical Record Report in February 2024, reviewing U.S. government involvement with UAP since 1945. It found no evidence that any government investigation confirmed extraterrestrial technology, and no empirical evidence of hidden reverse-engineering programs. It says interviewee claims came from misidentified real classified programs or circular reporting. It also names KONA BLUE as an unapproved proposal and identifies an alleged crash sample as a terrestrial alloy.

  • p. 10 …The program was never approved by DHS and its supporters never provided empirical evidence to support…
  • p. 11 …AARO assesses that some portion of sightings since the 1940s have represented misidentification of never-before…
  • p. 20 …holdings, 701 were categorized as unidentified and never solved.3839 CIA Evaluation of UFOs (1964) Background…
  • p. 23 …Unlike AAWSAP, AATIP was never an official DoD program. However, after AAWSAP was cancelled, the AATIP…
  • p. 24 …These scientific papers were never thoroughly peer reviewed. • AARO has yet to uncover any other substantive…
  • p. 27 …an advisory committee that advised the government, never reached any significant conclusions.80 • Canada’s Project…
  • p. 28 …the basis that it lacked any proof, and it was never published. The first Director of
  • p. 36 …The SAP was never approved or stood up, and no data or material was transferred to…
  • p. 37 …AARO notes that Persons 1 and 4 never formally sat down with AARO to provide official…
  • p. 45 …the mid-to-late 1990s.191 It never entered production, but the research conducted on Dark…
46
1 Anjali Nandan, “Eyewitness Testimony: A Psychological and Legal Perspective,” Journal of
Positive School of Psychology, 2022; Biswa Prakesh Nayak & H. Khajuria, “Eyewitness
Testimony: Probative Value in the Criminal Justice System,” Egyptian Journal of Forensic
Science, 2019; Stephen L. Chew, “Myth: Eyewitness Testimony is the Best Kind of Evidence,”
Association for Psychological Science, 2018; Fangting Liu, “The Reliability of Eyewitness
Testimony,” from the Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Public Relations and
Social Sciences, Atlantis Press, 2021.
2 Daniel Khaneman, “Thinking Fast and Slow,” Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux, 2013; Helen Lee,
“Don’t Let Anchoring Bias Weigh Down Your Judgment,” Harvard Business Review, August
30, 2022; Richard J, Heuer, Jr., “Psychology of Intelligence Analysis,” Novinka Books, 1999;
Drake Baer, “Kahneman: Your Confirmation Bias Acts Like an Optical Illusion,” The Cut,
January 13, 2017; Ben Yagoda, “The Cognitive Bias Tricking Your Brain,” The Atlantic,
September 2018.
3 https://military-history.fandom.com/wikiProject-Sign; Connors, Wendy, Project Blue Book
4 Edward J. Ruppelt, The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects (Doubleday, 1956),
https://ia801304.us.archive.org/22/items/FritjofCapraTheTurningPoint/Edward%20J%20Ruppelt
%20-%20The%20Report%20on%20Unidentified%20Flying%20Objects.pdf
5 Gerald K. Haines, “CIA's Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947-90,” Studies in Intelligence,
Vol 1, No. 1, (1997), pp. 67-84.
6 Russell Lee, “1947: Year of the Flying Saucer,” June 24, 2022,
https://www.airandsapce.si.edu/stories/editorial/1947-year-flying-saucer
7 Hector Quintanilla, Jr., “The Investigation of UFOs,” Studies in Intelligence, Vol. 10, No. 4
(Fall 1966), pp. 95-110, https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7282832
8 Edward J. Ruppelt, The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects (Doubleday, 1956),
https://ia801304.us.archive.org/22/items/FritjofCapraTheTurningPoint/Edward%20J%20Ruppelt
%20-%20The%20Report%20on%20Unidentified%20Flying%20Objects.pdf; USAF
https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%20Room/UFOsandUAPs/2d_a_
1.pdf
9 J. Marker, “Public Interest in UFOs Persists 50 Years after Project Blue Book Termination,” 2019;
Hector Quintanilla, Jr., “The Investigation of UFOs,” Studies in Intelligence, Vol. 10, No. 4 (Fall
1966), 95-110.

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 64 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.