Documents / Document

1948 07 9670642 20Mi SofMontgomery Ala 144 (Project Blue Book case file)

Internet Archive · 2015-12-05 · 161 pages · text by OCR

This Project Blue Book case file, digitized by the Internet Archive, covers Incident 144: two Eastern Airlines pilots reported that a wingless, cigar-shaped object with a flaming exhaust passed their DC-3 about 20 miles southwest of Montgomery, Alabama, on 24 July 1948. The file includes an OSI interview with a Robins Air Force Base employee who saw a similar object, negative aircraft traffic reports from many bases, and later correspondence. A December 1948 intelligence report found fairly consistent descriptions across four related sightings.

  • p. 50 …waves, nor was there any wash or mechanical disturbance when the object passed. No sound was…
  • p. 51 …IT ZOOMED INTO THE CLOUDS, ITS ACT WASH ROCKING OUR DC-3.* ESTIMATED THE UFO-S…
  • p. 55 …the aircraft passed them, they said, their DC-3 fluttered in the "prop-wash, jet-wash…
  • p. 58 …AND ZOOMED INTO THE CLOUDS, ITS PROP WASH OR JET WASH ROCKING OUR D.C.3…
  • p. 59 …3 battered in the "prop wash, jet wash or rocket-wash." the pilots said. "It sent…
  • p. 60 …Its prop-wash or jet-wash rocked our DC-3." The light of the plane and…
  • p. 62 …Hundreds of telephone calls flooded the Civil Aeronautics Administration office in Yakima, Wash., today from persons…
  • p. 72 …waves, nor was there any wash on peristaltic latusference during the object motion. No sound was…
  • p. 81 …There was no prop wash or rough air felt as it passed. After talking to the…
  • p. 86 …waves, nor was there any wash or mechanical disturbance when the object passed. No sound was…
  • p. 94 …waves, nor was there any wash or mechanical disturbance when the object passed. No sound was…
Incident 144 -- near Montgomery, Alabama -- 24 July 1943 144a, b -- near Blackstones, Virginia -- 24 July 1943

The famous "space snip" signin; reported in indicnt 144 should be compared with 163 and 203, and also with 144 and b, which to other constitute a separate incident if facts are correct as given.

for 144, there is no astronomical explanation if we accept the report at face value. The sheer improbability of the facts as stated, particularly in the absence of any known aircraft in the vicinity, makes it necessary to see whether any other explanation, even though far fetched, can be considered. The two reliable pilots obviously saw something. If one extracts from their reports parts of the description -- "trendous bursts of flame," "cirg-shaped," "disappeared into a cloud," "orange-red flame," "time in sight five to ten seconds" -- one sees that this much, at least, could be satisfied by a brilliant, slow-moving meteor. The orange-red flame is particularly suggestive. It is pertinent also, that the only passenger awake at the time the two pilots sighted the object gave a description that does not tally with that of a "space ship" but does agree with that of a meteor.

It will move to be left to the psychologists to tell us whether the immediate trail of a light netor could produce the subjective impression of a ship with lighted windows. Jonsiaorin; only the sighting, the hypothesis seems very impro- able. However, not included in the summary but mentioned in the

Cases discussed

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 161 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.